Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb
Yes, I heard that, too.

Do you suppose they will launch a 3-stage ICBM with a bigger payload next time?

I also heard that the end game (without using a nuke warhead) is to launch an ICBM with a conventional warhead and make it survive re-entry and detonate before hitting the ground. Do you think this is how they would proceed?

22 posted on 08/03/2017 8:32:44 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster

They sure could add a stage and get significant range and payload.

The Norks appear to have significant guidance problems with re-entry. Conventional munitions for any decent yield are very heavy also, but even 500 pounds would cause quite a fuss.

If I were the Norks, I would do a sub launch, conventional munitions, 250 miles off the coast of WA, CA, or OR and detonate suborbital, just inside international waters. They have that technology now, solid fuel, and have the subs to do it.

Legally, what would we say? That would really poke the bee hive.


23 posted on 08/03/2017 9:36:07 AM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson