Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grayboots

” is likely to be a relief to many agents at the F.B.I. who want a strong director to stave off any attempts by the White House to meddle in its investigations.”

Awful choice. One, he is a lawyer, not in law enforcement.
Two, we needed a Director that would kill the wrong idea that the President may not “meddle” in their investigations.
He IS the Chief federal law enforcement officer in the USA, just as he is THE commander in chief of the military. A general may not over rule him in a military manner. And an FBI man may not over rule him.

The FBI is not an independent agency, set as a watchdog over the executive branch. The mentality at the FBI today is utterly against the Constitution.
No surprise, that ratty branch is a pure distilled product of the Wilson progressive era.


17 posted on 08/01/2017 2:38:55 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

Thanks to the Senate, we can only get certain types of people confirmed.


20 posted on 08/01/2017 2:45:38 PM PDT by cmj328 (We live here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson