Unless I missed something I assume the title is wrong and it’s about “health INSURANCE reform” not “health CARE reform”.
And about the republican plan to pay for obamacare (and they get to rename it like a sports stadium since they pay).
And what they can do to make it appear like they are replacing obamacare while accepting the democrat’s basic idea of the ACA that it is the federal government’s duty to guarantee everyone health INSURANCE (but not health CARE).
Lefties shouting from balcony trying to disrupt the vote!
I agree. Heath insurance is not healthcare. It would be cheaper and easier to help those that truly can’t afford healthcare and let the free market and charity take care of the rest. When I say “truly need” I mean it. If parents can afford to buy new cars, iPhones, etc., but can’t afford to take their kids to the doctor that’s not my problem, and when I say my problem, I’m talking as a taxpayer that funds the government.
If it was actually about insurance reform, the USA might be better off.
However, the GOP plans have failed in the past because they focused on money alone.
If there was less money than under existing law, Democrats and RINOs brayed their complaints.
If there was more money than under existing law, everyone except the senator who last stuck his/her trotter in the federal money pot complained.
The coverage reform list that entropy12 compiled needs to be the basis for reform.
BINGO!!!
You didn’t miss anything......,