Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CRAAP From Librarians
Accuracy in Academia | July 25, 2017 | Brian McNicoll

Posted on 07/25/2017 9:45:01 AM PDT by Academiadotorg

Don't look now, but your local school library soon could be getting into the liberal indoctrination racket.

School librarians have taken it upon themselves to teach students how to identify fake news. They say they do this by helping them understand the CRAAP that comes their way.

CRAAP, which stands for Currency (timeliness), Relevance (importance), Authority (source), Accuracy (reliability) and Purpose (reason), "helps students sort through the overwhelming flood of digital information," according to a recent story in USA TODAY.

"These are the questions we have to introduce these ideas to kids before they think they know everything," Shannon Walters, identified in the story as the Burlington, Vt., High School librarian, reportedly told the paper.

Kids may know which images to post to Instagram and which to Snapchat, the story says. But it's up to educators to help them "discern fake from real."

The CRAAP system has students evaluate the accuracy and validity of content by asking the following questions:

• --Who is the author, publisher, source or sponsor?

• --Are the author’s credentials or organizational affiliations given?

• --What are the author’s credentials or affiliations?

• --What are the author’s qualifications to write on the topic?

• --Does the URL tell us anything about the author -- an .edu would indicate an educator for instance.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: academicbias; fakenews; libraries
Actually, the first word in the title of this piece by Brian McNicoll is an acronym, really...
1 posted on 07/25/2017 9:45:01 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

It’s also an excerpt from https://www.academia.org/craap-from-librarians/


2 posted on 07/25/2017 9:47:48 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

It’s about identifying the source of the news. If they’re not a liberal socialist, plug your ears and shout “la la la la I can’t hear you la la la”.


3 posted on 07/25/2017 9:50:20 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

“Don’t look now, but your local school library soon could be getting into the liberal indoctrination racket. “

I don’t see how this could be considered liberal indoctrination?

Showing kids how to separate the wheat from the chaff on the internet is a good thing.

.


4 posted on 07/25/2017 9:51:08 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

None of that will stop or identify ‘Fake News’.

‘Credentials’ mean nothing....................


5 posted on 07/25/2017 9:52:44 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

>>They say they do this by helping them understand the CRAAP that comes their way. CRAAP, which stands for Currency (timeliness), Relevance (importance), Authority (source), Accuracy (reliability) and Purpose (reason), “helps students sort through the overwhelming flood of digital information,” according to a recent story in USA TODAY.

When I entered college, this was the first thing I learned that applied to life in general. They didn’t use the acronym, but the 5 points of picking a source were all there.

The problem today is with Accuracy and Purpose. The Progressive “educator” will decide that anything with the purpose of creating a sense of freedom, individuality, or national identity is a “fake” purpose. Same for Accuracy.

CRAAP is a good idea. The problem is with a generation who believes that anything they disagree with is “hate”.


6 posted on 07/25/2017 9:55:01 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
I don’t see how this could be considered liberal indoctrination? Showing kids how to separate the wheat from the chaff on the internet is a good thing.

While they describe it in a politically neutral and benign way, I promise it will be used to the advantage of liberal lies. Everything is, ethics laws and so forth. They become weapons to use against conservatives while liberals get a free pass every time, and the conservatives sit and take it, typically.

7 posted on 07/25/2017 9:55:45 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg
RE:"More than 80 percent thought the sponsored content was real news. Fewer than 20 percent questioned the source of a photo containing a false report of mutated flowers from a nuclear power plant failure."

Yep, they are corporations dream

8 posted on 07/25/2017 9:56:24 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Message to Trump : I am not tired of winning yet. Please more winning ! Get your crap together fast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

it’s a system to train people to accept information only from authority

AKA an institutionalization of the “call to authority” fallacy


9 posted on 07/25/2017 10:09:05 AM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg
The libraries at the University of Texas and Texas A&M are run by liberal Democrats. One just needs to find an employee roster and see what they post on Facebook. They are rabid lefties.
10 posted on 07/25/2017 10:18:36 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

They are really behind the times. More kids are searching their I-phones for info than going into libraries and asking librarians for advice.


11 posted on 07/25/2017 10:32:31 AM PDT by Slyfox (Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

I object to the fact that their acronym is not exactly a decent word. The connotation they are pushing is obvious.

If they had chosen a different acronym I might regard this differently.


12 posted on 07/25/2017 10:36:41 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg
Communist Goals (1963)

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."


13 posted on 07/25/2017 10:53:24 AM PDT by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

Okay, they could have at least changed the word order. Two strikes against it right out of the shoot.

Will have the kids AND the adults snickering.


14 posted on 07/25/2017 11:18:43 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

The only librarian I now is a hard core Lefty. I figured this had been going on already, for years.


15 posted on 07/25/2017 11:25:27 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell service T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

Where I live, this profession is on its death bed. Our city opened two new libraries, which I found strange considering it was exhausting its library budget. It did it through automation. More libraries and less librarians. You can pretty much place holds, and pick up books with no interaction with a person anymore.


16 posted on 07/25/2017 11:40:44 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

“Authority” is a huge problem. So many “authorities” are incompetent pretenders (climate ‘scientists’, economists, etc etc). As an example - Dr Benjamin Spock was the AUTHORITY on child rearing. Yet he never reared a child and his methods were disastrous. Dr Kinsey was a charlatan who molested children yet his work is still considered authoritative.


17 posted on 07/25/2017 12:46:15 PM PDT by Seruzawa (FABOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

& don’t forget that authoritative book, Silent Spring


18 posted on 07/26/2017 11:15:29 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson