That may well be true, but how does his parole for a different offense relate to the botched murder trial?
as the author clearly states, had there not been a botched murder trial, there would have been no armed robbery sentencing leading to parole...he would have been in prison on a double murder conviction...you guys are making this more difficult than it needs to be...
Once acquitted, he is *legally* innocent.
Your chest-pounding on the subject, as well as that of this author - is utter bull schmidt.
If you decide you can judge and punish this man for an offense he was acquitted of (rightly or wrongly), please turn in your conservative, intellectual, and American identity cards immediately. You have forfeited them all.
If you think I’m being bombastic, please take some time to read up on what we used to call the “rule of law”.