FBI Agents Seize Smashed Hard Drives in Muslim IT Hacking Case

Front Page ^ | July 24, 2017 | Daniel Greenfield

[detective]

It wasn't that long ago that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was trying to browbeat the Capitol Police over a laptop in the Muslim IT hacking case.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that she says belongs to her in order to build a criminal case against a Pakistani staffer suspected of massive cybersecurity breaches involving funneling sensitive congressional data offsite.

The Florida lawmaker used her position on the committee that sets the police force’s budget to press its chief to relinquish the piece of evidence Thursday, in what could be considered using her authority to attempt to interfere with a criminal investigation.

[detective]

Hopefully, instead of the phony Russia investigation, the FBI can investigate real corruption where there is actual proof of wrong doing.

[Fantasywriter]

I came across this on The_Donald. For all we know, the FBI seized the wreckage to safeguard it.

‘This whole “FBI seizes hard drives...” story is utter nonsense. The FBI didn’t seize anything, the current tenant in the house called authorities when he found smashed govt computers in recycle bins and they eventually came to pick them up. This is some sensationalized drama.’

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6p7e4o/this_whole_fbi_seizes_hard_drives_story_is_utter/

[Red Badger]

... what could be considered using her authority to attempt to interfere with a criminal investigation.

It is..........................

[Red Badger]

...the current tenant in the house called authorities when he found smashed govt computers in recycle bins...

Well, at least they were environmentally friendly..................

[Fantasywriter]

You made me laugh.

[Paladin2]

How timely.

[caligatrux]

This whole case has to be one of the most under-reported scandals I have ever seen. Utterly ridiculous that the major news outlets are crawling all over this.

[b4its2late]

Hi Scrunchie!

[afraidfortherepublic]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3571526/posts

Another article on the same topic with many details I had not read elsewhere.

[Yosemitest]

That photo is a real hoot.


But here's some more background about the subject.

The Democratic National Committee REFUSED to allow their computers and servers to be searched for evidence.
WHY ?
I propose that

the Democratic National Committee hired Amid Awan, Jamal Awan, Imran Awan, and Rao Abbas to do the hacking to search for evidence against their opponents in the 2016 election,
and also had them hack the Democratic National Committee's own computers and servers, so as to remove suspicion from the DemocRATS.

Consider the following information about the SO CALLED Russian Hacking.
I believe it was the Democratic National Committee who was DOING the hacking and leaving FALSE TRACES of the Russians.
We MUST INVESTIGATE the Democratic National Committee's servers ! ! !

Let's review a few pieces of history, such as:

CBS NEWS on December 12, 2016, John Bolton says claims of Russian hacking could be "false flag" operation

MotherBoard.Vice.com on Oct 12 2016, How Hackers Plant False Flags to Hide Their Real Identities

Politico on Dec 11 2016 Bolton: Russian hacks could actually have been by Obama administration

National Review on Nov 1 2016 The Clinton E-mails Are Critical to the Clinton Foundation Investigation

The Rush Limbaugh Show on Jun 13, 2017 We Have Evidence That Loretta Lynch Obstructed Justice

NewsMax on May 31 2017 Debbie Wasserman Schultz Admits She Violated Information Security Policy 'For Years'

Politico on Mar 1 2017 House Democrats fire two IT staffers amid criminal investigation

The Daily Caller on Mar 4 2017 EXCLUSIVE: House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs Committee Members Compromised By Rogue IT Staff

Now based on the articles linked above, I propose to you that it is VERY POSSIBLE AND CREDIBLE

that the Democratic National Committee,
under the direction of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hillary and Bill Clinton, and the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF,
hired Amid Awan, Jamal Awan, Imran Awan, and Rao Abbas
to hack those computers,
and to place false flags to make it look as if the Russians did the hacking.

On the other side of the issue is:

The Glenn Beck Program on Jun 13, 2017 EXCLUSIVE: Jim DeMint Weighs in on Russia and His New Role at Convention of States

Bloomberg.Com on June 13, 2017 Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known

Schneier on Security on Jun 9 2017 NSA Document Outlining Russian Attempts to Hack Voter Rolls

TheIntercept.Com on June 5 2017


TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION

Now, I trust former Senator Jim DeMint, and I trust Rush and Glenn.
But all former Senator Jim DeMint has is the document he was shown and briefed upon, and they came from a corrupted agency under Obama and his minions.

In closing, let me make it clear that

I strongly believe that document and other sources were generated by Amid Awan, Jamal Awan, Imran Awan, and Rao Abbas,
while they were working for he Democratic National Committee, under the direction of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hillary and Bill Clinton, and the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF .


Imran Awan, target of a House security probe, worked in IT for Rep. Andre Carson, a member of the intelligence committee


Former President Bill Clinton with alleged Muslim Spy Imran Awan


Wasserman Schultz Threatened Police Chief For Gathering Evidence On Her IT Staffer’s Alleged Crimes


THE AWAN BROTHERS PAKISTANI/AMERICAN INTERNET SECURITY TEAM


Obama Placed ISLAMIC SPIES in the Federal Government. Details Are Treason.

[b4its2late]

Related - EXCLUSIVE: FBI Says ‘Awan Brothers’ Hard Drives Were Smashed After Confiscated As Law Enforcement Evidence

[Fantasywriter]

Thanks for the ping. How reliable is Truepundit?

[Bookshelf]

How reliable is the FBI?

[Cementjungle]

How reliable is the FBI?

Right now? About as reliable as any other outfit still being run by Obama appointees and deep state insiders.

[Fantasywriter]

The issue is whether Truepundit’s reporting has a high degree of reliability or not.

[jjotto]

I wouldn’t place any bets on truepundit being remotely accurate.

[Fantasywriter]

That confirms my suspicions. A lot of the most dramatic news these days comes from anonymous sources, and rarely turns out to be factual.