Posted on 07/14/2017 4:14:22 PM PDT by RightGeek
On July 5, CNN published an article titled:
Forty-Four States and DC Have Refused To Give Certain Voter Information to Trump Commission
Sounds like a nationwide stand of virtuous victims: what could possibly appear more empowering to the #Resistance’s swarm of Facebook activists? Indeed, thousands shared the piece based solely on the headline; they didn’t bother clicking.
But those who did, and who additionally read the article with the learned approach of objective analysis, subsequently found that the article immediately negated both its headline and much of its following content.
[SNIP] At the end of June, Kobach sent the same letter to all fifty states.
The letter included this request:
[I]n order for the Commission to fully analyze vulnerabilities and issues related to voter registration and voting, I am requesting that you provide to the Commission the publicly available voter roll data for [your respective State], including, if publicly available under the laws of your state, the full first and last names of all registrants, middle names or initials if available, addresses, dates of birth, political party (if recorded in your state), last four digits of social security number if available, voter history (elections voted in) from 2006 onward, active/inactive status, cancelled status, information regarding any felony convictions, information regarding voter registration in another state, information regarding military status, and overseas citizen information. (Emphasis added)
Do note that Kobach included the pivotal words “publicly available,” and that he redundantly included the pivotal words “publicly available” twice, as I just did redundantly, because Kobach was probably of the mind that the swamp creatures were going to dishonestly grandstand about the contents of his letter.
Indeed, CNN did notice that Kobach had twice included those pivotal words, and CNN recognized that they were, indeed, pivotal.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Read the whole thing. CNN is scum.
One political party routinely insists that the possibility of vote fraud must never be scientifically studied.
One political party is routinely accused by the media of rejecting science.
In a rational world, those parties would be the same.
All those states with Secretaries of State that Soros paid for will not turn over records that prove they have been allowing non-citizens and dead people to vote.
bkmk
And then almost immediately, hundreds of registered voters in Colorado rushed to "withdraw" their names from the voter rolls.
I work with voter rolls quite a lot in my own state, and have never heard of any voter "withdrawing" his or her name. Switching parties, or declaring oneself an independent –yes, those voter actions are common. But completely removing oneself from voter rolls, no.
they illegally registered and think they are avoiding being charged. However they can and should all be charged.
It seems that more and more stories are being written with misleading, dishonest, or downright lies as headlines.
And, of course, the Clinton News Network can always be counted on to be the most dishonest.
Georgia’s Secretary of State said they would fully comply “EXCEPT”
our state privacy laws prohibit sharing of
the last 4 numbers of the voter’s social security numbers.
When I registered to vote, a SSN was not required.
I’d say it was damned decent of them to hold up their hands (so to speak). Makes the state officials jobs easier. I hope they’re prosecuted!
Some predictions: The Dems are going to scream bloody murder as the commission demonstrates that the voter rolls contain 30-50% multiple registrations, with some percentage being false positives; The commission will show over 10% of registered voters have been dead for over 2 years; Daffy Duck is registered in at least two states.
The only way a social security number is needed for voting is for the election workers so they can get paid.
The entire story is fake. Every federal court in every state, PR and Guam have all voter rooos at least once a year.
I work with voter rolls quite a lot in my own state, and have never heard of any voter "withdrawing" his or her name. Switching parties, or declaring oneself an independent –yes, those voter actions are common. But completely removing oneself from voter rolls, no. 5 posted on 7/14/2017, 6:54:13 PM by shhrubbery! (NIH!)
Just curious..
I have worked the polls before and I would think... they can pull their voter registration but their info back when they voted is still there including the past primaries they voted in. Stupid people, or are they guilty people?
Good point!
My guess is: Both stupid and guilty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.