Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Psychiatry professors call on Congress to ‘end the Trump presidency’ (Univ. Quacks)
The Washington Times ^ | July 14, 2017 | Jessica Chasmar

Posted on 07/14/2017 2:19:29 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: jazusamo
Perhaps the professors are just projecting their own advanced Trump Derangement Syndrome, soon to have its own DSM-IV category. Their "diagnosis" seems pretty unusual for psychiatrists, since it doesn't correspond to any DSM-IV categories:

"The signs of the president’s unraveling are stark, and they are contributing to his inability to govern: his failure to guard against hacking of our elections and related threats to national security, his decimation of the State Department and other vital government agencies, his irrational, unilateral withdrawal from the world’s commitment to prevent catastrophic climate change, his intemperate exploitation of the presidency to enrich himself and his family, his unremitting threats against a free press, his vitriolic verbal assaults against anyone (especially any woman) who questions his actions or state of mind, and his imposition of false narratives whenever the truth casts him in a bad light."

I'm still trying to figure out how President Trump was supposed to "guard against hacking of our elections and related threats to national security" before he was elected. Wouldn't that have been President Obama's job? Apparently for these psychiatrists a new form of mental illness is being unable to control the actions of someone else in the past. That looks like a type of projection to me from some doctors who are suffering from psychosis attributable to Trump Derangement Syndrome.

41 posted on 07/14/2017 3:15:34 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

I “call on” all universities and colleges to end tenure for these pinheaded idiots called “professors”. How would these unethical, protected-from-reality morons like that?


42 posted on 07/14/2017 3:15:39 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

43 posted on 07/14/2017 3:31:10 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

No doubt they also think somebody can be born male but really be a female. I’ve always thought many people study psychology thinking they can figure out their own mental problems.


44 posted on 07/14/2017 3:31:11 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind. ~ Hosea 8:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

How embarrassing. . . for Obama. Trump has accomplished far more in 7 months than Obama did in his 8 years and an “illustrious” team of psychiatrists have determined that TRUMP is unfit for office....

It’s creepy to see the way communism used psychiatry to successfully eliminate political adversaries and then look at the way the industry in the US has been dominated/taken over by the left. I’ve read that students are rebuffed by professors if they are in the “wrong” political party. Can’t get advanced degree in psychology in many universities unless you are a native speaker of the leftist language.


45 posted on 07/14/2017 3:36:07 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The first shrink who can either cure a patient or accurately predict behavior is the one I will listen too. So far there aren’t any.


46 posted on 07/14/2017 3:38:47 PM PDT by Seruzawa (FABOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Psychiatry professors fraudsters. Might as well be a bunch of astrologers. Our universities are damned poor at keeping the phonies out.

Szasz was an atheist but was more in agreement with God about psychiatry than he knew! (He wrote a career's worth of books on the subject)

47 posted on 07/14/2017 3:38:50 PM PDT by avenir (I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
"Probably highly unethical for psychiatrists to be making public statements about the mental status of anyone they haven’t interviewed and diagnosed in person"

No "probably". It's downright disgraceful.

Really.

If you had an appointment with a psychiatrist and they looked you up on Facebook and found they hated your politics, do you think that you could POSSIBLY get decent care from them?

These so-called "doctors" are dishonest morons, who should NOT be trusted with patient care in any capacity.

48 posted on 07/14/2017 3:48:10 PM PDT by boop (I'd wish you luck, but you wouldn't know what to do with it if you had it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

My understanding is it is unethical for doctors to do this. Person has to have been your patient, or you have to have examined them.I suspect of you look into it, these folks are in fact not licensed to practice medicine.


49 posted on 07/14/2017 3:51:17 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If these are actually MD psychiatrists, somebody should contact their respective state medical boards and file complaints against them. They are simply labeling a victim from afar, with no examination whatsoever. Pure malice. Pure malpractice.


50 posted on 07/14/2017 3:52:24 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

noose getting tighter around your liberal fascist necks


51 posted on 07/14/2017 3:53:11 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (Trump plays chess the rest are still playing checkers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Dee Mosbacher - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dee_Mosbacher

Diane “Dee” Mosbacher, MD, Ph.D., (born January 13, 1949 in Houston, Texas) is an American filmmaker, lesbian feminist activist, and practicing psychiatrist.


52 posted on 07/14/2017 3:55:12 PM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER

Symptoms Include:

The symptoms are

53 posted on 07/14/2017 4:01:58 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (A press can be “associated,” or a press can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Agreed


54 posted on 07/14/2017 4:04:05 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: avenir

Yes, I’ve heard of him. I’m sorry to say I’ve never read any of his books.


55 posted on 07/14/2017 4:04:20 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
None of these psychiatrists have examined him and it is quite unethical to diagnose someone without examining the person.

Very true and their comments are an absolute disgrace.

Early in my career, I could see the American Psychiatric Association, at their annual meetings, was going far left.

They're ignoring the Goldwater Rule: "The Goldwater rule is the informal name given to Section 7 in the American Psychiatric Association's Principles of Medical Ethics, which states it is unethical for psychiatrists to give a professional opinion about public figures they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained consent to discuss their mental health in public statements. It is named after presidential candidate Barry Goldwater."

Of course, the end justifies the means preempts the Goldwater Rule with currents leftists.

56 posted on 07/14/2017 4:09:03 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: boop

Well, of course it is “disgraceful”, but professionals such as psychiatrists also have formal codes of ethics which are enforceable by specific sanctions if those to whom they apply are found to violate them - I don’t know how the psychiatric code is worded, but I would be surprised if it were not contrary to it in some way to diagnose, analyze and essentially prescribe for anyone not seen personally - that’s why a timely complaint to the American Psychiatric Association might induce the professors to decide they acted inappropriately.....


57 posted on 07/14/2017 4:14:33 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I call for an immediate end to the psychiatrists career and professional license for violation of Section 7 in the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Principles of Medical Ethics, which states it is unethical for psychiatrists to give a professional opinion about public figures they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained consent to discuss their mental health in public statements..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule


58 posted on 07/14/2017 4:17:57 PM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

What’s funny is the fake news media and Democrats sound insane ranting about a non-existent Russian conspiracy to allegedly tamper with our electoral processes to get Trump elected.

No, our psychiatric professors won’t venture an opinion about that state of mind. Instead of calling them on it, Trump is the one with a few screws loose.

Yup, definite lefty projection going on here.


59 posted on 07/14/2017 4:18:15 PM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

There was quite a heated discussion on the Goldwater Rule at the APA annual conference in San Diego earlier this year.


60 posted on 07/14/2017 4:19:59 PM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson