Posted on 07/01/2017 8:11:26 AM PDT by Lorianne
Scarborough’s claim is inherently extraordinary until proven otherwise.
All claims are not equal. The function/mechanism of support may be the same, but the quanity/quality of evidence varies based on how uncommon the claim is.
My car is red. Here’s a picture of me with it. Sufficient proof.
Invisible Pink elephants are constantly dancing around us. Here’s a picture, but you can’t see them.
Michael Moore also faced Scarboroughs wrath after he registered the domain name JoeScarboroughKilledHisIntern.com, another Vanity Fair article notes. (The website never really got off the ground.)
I totally respect your right to hold onto a logical fallacy disclaimed by its original author. I presume you are not aware that that phrase is a very common one used by the Left to suppress dissent without discussion.
amazing stories... where is the truth
what are unfounded allegations.... dunno
I believe the version where he asked to get a story squashed and an aide told him to recant the crap he’s been spewing about Trump - no promises made and he’s the one who made the initial request.
Sorry but proust makes sense, your sounds SUBJECTIVE! HEH HEH
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.