[the OlLine Rebel]

Geesh. She's a biker too.

[PAR35]

Be interesting to watch the defense tactics here. This gives them a good shot at a continuance, but that is part of Reyna’s stall tactics.

The judge is likely to be a good boy and put off all the other trials if this one is continued and Reyna so directs.

The Court of Appeals has already ruled that the right to a speedy trial doesn’t exist in Waco.

[PAR35]

By the way.

In before....

[House Atreides]

Yeah, IBTG.

[wastoute]

IBTG

[wastoute]

8 years to go before a patsy gets a wrist slap.

[Boomer]

At this point, due to how this entire thing was handled, I hope everyone gets off scott free, wins their civil case to the tune of millions each for all 155 of them, and Reyna gets disbarred for his complete corruption in this case.

I know there were some crimes committed at TP that day by a very few individuals. The fact that Reyna conspired to take down as many of the innocent bystanders as he could reeks of corruption. He needs to pay for that in every way the law allows. Use his own tool against him.

Oh, and tg, pack sand; right up to the belt.

[Elderberry]

When it becomes clear that a defendant insists on his innocence and intends to take accusations to trial, prosecutors are known to double down on their allegations and file lengthened, “superseding” indictments, usually adding more pages of accusations.

When prosecutors file superseding indictments, judges shockingly allow prosecutors to try defendants according to any one or a combination of the indictments on file in a case, so that defendants may not even know what charges to prepare for at trial. “[T]he government may elect to proceed on any pending indictment,” wrote the U.S. Ninth Circuit in a recent opinion, “whether it is the most recently returned superseding indictment or a prior indictment.”

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/10/roger-roots/no-more-speedy-trials/