Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A ‘very credible’ new study on Seattle’s $15 minimum wage has bad news for liberals
Washongton Post ^ | June 26, 2017 | Max Ehrenfreund

Posted on 06/26/2017 2:22:31 PM PDT by grundle

When Seattle officials voted three years ago to incrementally boost the city's minimum wage up to $15 an hour, they'd hoped to improve the lives of low-income workers. Yet according to a major new study that could force economists to reassess past research on the issue, the hike has had the opposite effect.

The city is gradually increasing the hourly minimum to $15 over several years. Already, though, some employers have not been able to afford the increased minimums. They've cut their payrolls, putting off new hiring, reducing hours or letting their workers go, the study found.

The costs to low-wage workers in Seattle outweighed the benefits by a ratio of three to one, according to the study, conducted by a group of economists at the University of Washington who were commissioned by the city. The study, published as a working paper Monday by the National Bureau of Economic Research, has not yet been peer reviewed.

On the whole, the study estimates, the average low-wage worker in the city lost $125 a month because of the hike in the minimum.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2017 2:22:31 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

When it gets more expensive to hire people, a city will have fewer jobs. Who would have guessed?


2 posted on 06/26/2017 2:24:55 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

SURPRISE!!!!!!! Who didn’t see that coming??


3 posted on 06/26/2017 2:25:20 PM PDT by rustyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Low wage jobs should not be considered family supporting jobs. They are entry level jobs that kids should be hired on to do.


4 posted on 06/26/2017 2:25:21 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

No worries though, the illegals and hood rats that infest Seattle will gladly work under the table to pick up the slack.


5 posted on 06/26/2017 2:26:04 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

So stupid. Even a blind man can see it. You don’t need a “very credible new study”. You just need common sense.

Forced higher wages=forced higher costs=necessitates cutting higher costs by reducing the payroll.

DUH!

The Lying Left. Purveyors of paltry fascist tyranny and destroyers of economic growth and wealth.


6 posted on 06/26/2017 2:26:35 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Agriculture is the only business in this country where the business owner is told how much he/she will be paid for the crops/food they produce.


7 posted on 06/26/2017 2:27:29 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

If they’d listen to conservatives or common sense, the answer is simple: the more you raise minimum wage, the less opening jobs there will be.


8 posted on 06/26/2017 2:27:51 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I had to click the link.

The ComPost is actually reporting real news? (Not fake?)

And reporting a basic fundamental truth that was well known to anyone with a brain? (That excludes all liberals.)

Has Hell frozen over?


9 posted on 06/26/2017 2:28:14 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This never was about improving the lives of low paid workers. It was about increasing the number and salaries of union workers which increases the amount of money unions have to spend on electing people who favor unions.


10 posted on 06/26/2017 2:29:42 PM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

But university professors and socialist democrat politicians have never had to earn money. Only divide it up between bureaucrats.


11 posted on 06/26/2017 2:29:54 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I’m shocked!

Shocked that the editors at WP let this slip by!..................


12 posted on 06/26/2017 2:30:32 PM PDT by Red Badger (Unless you eat The Bread of Life, you are toast!.......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
The disadvantage of a step program to do this is that Lieberals won't learn from the experience, as they jump into cool water and only raise the temperature gradually. Of course, they wouldn't learn with an all-at-once increase either .


13 posted on 06/26/2017 2:31:08 PM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Dang. It must suck when the people you commissioned come out against you.


14 posted on 06/26/2017 2:31:23 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Only divide it up between bureaucrats.

Right. As Thatcher said, socialism only works until you run out of other people's money.

The Lying Left. Purveyors of poverty and tyranny.

15 posted on 06/26/2017 2:32:32 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Me too. See post 9.

See the WaPo comments. They’re seething with anger over there.

I love this comment and rejoinder......

OZieJohn

4:29 PM CDT

What happens when the USA joins the rest of the world and pays 4 weeks annual vacation, sick pay, maternity leave ....?

LikeReplyShare

dgnorfolk

4:31 PM CDT

60% income taxes on those who earn a living.


16 posted on 06/26/2017 2:34:24 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

University professors like in a world of ‘theory’.
To them, their theories are the do all and end all of economics. They don’t in any way, shape, or form reflect real life conditions.

They have never had to actually make payroll or deal with the myriad of city, county, state and federal regulations imposed upon a business. Their theories don’t include such minutia.

They never, ever take into account such things as human behavior when theorizing..................


17 posted on 06/26/2017 2:35:19 PM PDT by Red Badger (Unless you eat The Bread of Life, you are toast!.......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Democrats could care less. Passing the bill made them feel good, consequences be damned. They’ll never admit they were wrong.


18 posted on 06/26/2017 2:37:19 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Already, though, some employers have not been able to afford the increased minimums.

Well, yes, but it's more than that - who hires when the state is already declaring a mandatory wage increase in the future whether you will be able to afford it or not then, even if they can afford it now? It's a hiring slowdown that's showing up now; the layoffs of existing workers are likely to accelerate as the wages go up incrementally and businesses find that they can't keep up without going broke. In short, the problem is only beginning. And the real minimum wage is nothing.

19 posted on 06/26/2017 2:38:20 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
This never was about improving the lives of low paid workers. It was about increasing the number and salaries of union workers which increases the amount of money unions have to spend on electing people who favor unions.

Bingo!!! Raise the floor rate and hourly rates of all above go up commensurately (regardless how many fewer "floor rate" employees still exist!)

20 posted on 06/26/2017 2:39:18 PM PDT by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson