[AnotherUnixGeek]

But what decision DID they leave in place????

From the article:

"California law generally prevents carrying a handgun outside a home, but concealed carry is allowed for those with a license. Applicants for such a license need to demonstrate "good cause" to obtain the license, which several sheriffs have taken to mean including carrying a handgun for self-defense, as the petitioners noted in their brief to the Supreme Court. But in San Diego, the sheriff defined "good cause" as requiring a "particularized" need for self-defense that separates the applicant from an average applicant."

The ruling which stands is that the sheriff's policy does not violate the 2nd Amendment.

[eartick]

The ruling which stands is that the sheriff's policy does not violate the 2nd Amendment.

That sheriff and the SCOTUS can kiss my a$$.

The good Lord gives us the right and the 2nd codifies it.

I will carry when and how I want to and no MAN will deprive me of that