“...since part of the benefit of carrying a concealed weapon is that potential attackers do not know who is armed. That’s why uniformed police have an almost impossible job stopping terrorist attacks.”
And there’s the CCW dig.
jughandle wrote:
““...since part of the benefit of carrying a concealed weapon is that potential attackers do not know who is armed. That’s why uniformed police have an almost impossible job stopping terrorist attacks.”
And there’s the CCW dig.”
I think it’s not a dig; it’s saying if there were more CCW’s, not just uniformed cops, then there’d be a better chance of stopping an attacker sooner.
Crime drops when more people have CCW’s, and if there are —less— gun-free zones, the better.