Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1

I think this is unconstitutional. States can’t interfere with interstate commerce.


2 posted on 06/25/2017 7:06:43 AM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CondorFlight

Not engaging in commerce among the States though is not interstate commerce.

The Constitution doesn’t grant the federal power to regulate things that affect commerce among the several States but are not interstate commerce themselves: like growing your own feed stock or engaging in commerce within a state.

That the federal does so is an artifact of FDR era lawlessness. High handed lawlessness at that.


18 posted on 06/25/2017 7:31:19 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: CondorFlight
I think this is unconstitutional. States can’t interfere with interstate commerce.

USC Article IV, Section 1:

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

28 posted on 06/25/2017 7:43:50 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (The Civil Rights movement compared content of their character to skin color and chose the latter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: CondorFlight
I think this is unconstitutional. States can’t interfere with interstate commerce.

The Ninth District Court disagrees with you.

I'd wear that as a badge of honor...

43 posted on 06/25/2017 7:56:47 AM PDT by null and void ( If you thought National Socialism (Nazism) was bad, wait until you see Global Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson