Replies

The bottom line evidence for the takedown also includes the Crowdstrike report of the DNC server.

I often forget to add, it is possible for "hacking" and "insider leak" to be concurrent. It is possible that the DNC server was infected with viruses, and for the Wikileaks material to have come from a completely different source. The CIA, NSA nad FBI invite the leap to conclusion that because the server was infected, the infection is the vector for Wikileaks. But they never connect the dots. The evidence trail DOES NOT EXIST.

Agreed. The Dems did not want to track the source of the leak. DWS says DHS and the FBI never contacted her about the hacking and offered no assistance. That sounds like the WH got involved and called off the dogs believing that Hillary would win easily and that any real investigation might reveal an inside job. The Russian narrative was employed after the loss on November 8.

Without sounding like a conspiracy nut, the death of Seth Rich and the events following it suggest that the hacking was an inside job by an angry Bernie supporter. No one doubts that the leaks were accurate, which brings into question the operations of the DNC, their collusion with the MSM, and the fixing of the primary in favor of Hillary. Pretty damning stuff.

"We can say, we have said, repeatedly over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party."
--Jullian Assange, WikiLeaks