Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump administration removes protections for Yellowstone grizzly bears
The Hill ^ | 06/22/17 03:43 PM EDT | TIMOTHY CAMA

Posted on 06/22/2017 4:23:53 PM PDT by COBOL2Java

The Trump administration is removing Endangered Species Act protections for Yellowstone grizzly bears, after they spent more than four decades on the threatened list.

The Interior Department’s Fish and Wildlife Service announced the delisting decision Thursday, which immediately drew rebukes from conservationists and Democrats.

Officials said that conservation efforts for the bear, a more than fourfold increase in its population and state policies designed to protect the bears show that the delisting is warranted.

The Yellowstone grizzly bear lives in and around Yellowstone National Park in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho.

“This achievement stands as one of America’s great conservation successes; the culmination of decades of hard work and dedication on the part of state, tribal, federal and private partners,” Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, who represented Montana in Congress until earlier this year, said in a statement. “As a Montanan, I am proud of what we’ve achieved together.” Other segments of the grizzly bear population are not affected by Thursday’s regulation and will continue to be protected as before.

The bear’s population is now around 700, compared with 150 when it was first listed. Its range is 22,500 square miles, more than double the range of the mid-1970s.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Idaho; US: Montana; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: bears; maga; wildlife; yellowstone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2017 4:23:53 PM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

2 posted on 06/22/2017 4:26:31 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Smoky The Bear is not gonna like that.
3 posted on 06/22/2017 4:27:46 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Breaking News: Trump Hates Bears!!!


4 posted on 06/22/2017 4:29:57 PM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

The only good bear is a dead bear.


5 posted on 06/22/2017 4:30:19 PM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

When are they gonna blame Palin for this?

3...2...1....


6 posted on 06/22/2017 4:31:35 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Once the delisting formally takes effect, conservation groups, states and others may sue the administration to have the decision overturned.

I wonder if they will present any actual studies and evidence to support their suit? Oh, they'll file this with the 9th Circus and hand-wringing will suffice for evidence. Never mind.

7 posted on 06/22/2017 4:31:58 PM PDT by NutsOnYew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Instead of touting the success of being able to delist the bears, it’s the negative “removes protections”.


8 posted on 06/22/2017 4:32:15 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
I've been waiting for an article like this to show up, making the grizzly delisting a Trump thing with Democrats opposed.

Fun fact: it was under the Obama administration that the delisting process began over a year ago. The Trump administration just finished it out.

Anything the media can do to stir up sentiment against Trump, they will. This is a great example- they omitted the fact that delisting started under Obama. Why do that? So then they could frame it as an unpopular Trump decision, with people opposed to it.

Frickin' media
9 posted on 06/22/2017 4:32:22 PM PDT by verum ago (Some people must truly be in love, for only love can be so blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
There is no such thing as a "Yellowstone Grizzly Bear."

These are highly intelligent, curious, dangerous animals that can range hundreds of miles. Grizzlies have been increasing their range throughout all of North America for decades, not just within some little box that tree huggers draw around the northwestern corner of Wyoming.

I started frequenting YNP in the early eighties, and have probably been in the backcountry of Yellowstone and Grand Tetons with my wife and (older) children for at least a week going on a dozen times. During that time I've watched a complete change in the Park's attitude toward black bears and Grizzlies, mostly good. About ten years ago, we started seeing Grizzlies almost all the way down to Jackson Hole. This move seems correct to me.

10 posted on 06/22/2017 4:33:36 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

More Winning!


11 posted on 06/22/2017 4:33:49 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Great! Now open season on wolves!


12 posted on 06/22/2017 4:37:18 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java; RightGeek; Hyman Roth; ak267; NutsOnYew; Calvin Locke; verum ago; FredZarguna; ...
Anybody realize that National Parks are a Teddy Roosevelt-launched "feel-good" federal tyranny? There is NO constitutional authorization for the feds to occupy state lands for "National Parks". They are essentially an unconstitutional and illegal federal land grab.

States should immediately take back all lands unconstitutionally occupied by the feds including National Parks. If the people of the state want to protect those lands, then they can turn them into state parks.

The Congress shall have Power...to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings U.S. Constitution, Art I, Sec 8, Cl 17).

The above constitutional clause outlines the ONLY constitutional authorization for federal occupation within a state. National Parks do not meet these requirements.

Trump is doing the right thing by beginning to divest federal control of these state lands.

13 posted on 06/22/2017 4:43:11 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Road Warrior ‘04

Wolf tag is $11.50 here in Idaho, limit 5 per person. Plus another 5 if you’re trapping. Not bad when you consider what the situation was just 5 years ago.


14 posted on 06/22/2017 4:44:53 PM PDT by verum ago (Some people must truly be in love, for only love can be so blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Maybe Trump is sending a subtle message to the great Russian Bear Putin!


15 posted on 06/22/2017 4:46:13 PM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


16 posted on 06/22/2017 4:48:21 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verum ago

Hmm, actually, perusing my hard copy of the hunting regs I no longer see the 5 per person limit.

We do have quotas in place though, to make sure the population doesn’t get low enough for the Greens to force them back onto the endangered species list.


17 posted on 06/22/2017 4:49:51 PM PDT by verum ago (Some people must truly be in love, for only love can be so blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: verum ago

Check that, the limit to 5 just got moved to a different spot. Still there.


18 posted on 06/22/2017 4:52:27 PM PDT by verum ago (Some people must truly be in love, for only love can be so blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NutsOnYew

It depends if the President mentioned any anti bear remarks while campaigning.


19 posted on 06/22/2017 4:52:35 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ak267

Schumer and Pelosi will be “outraged!”, I’m sure.


20 posted on 06/22/2017 4:56:44 PM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson