Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cecily

I agree with Travis McGee:

Really seems like “Nautical Jihad”

Why the insane U-turn...?

Cuz it was DELIBERATE.


9 posted on 06/20/2017 8:52:21 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gaijin; Travis McGee; Cecily

I have a huge amount of respect for Travis McGee (and you too, gaijin) but in light of information coming out, regarding the timing, I don’t think there is any hostile intent. I think it was caused by human factors.

But, as I have said on this specific issue, I reserve the right to change my mind as more information is available. At this time, I don’t think it was hostile intent.


12 posted on 06/20/2017 8:59:13 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals are in a state of constant cognitive dissonance, which explains their mental instability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin

>Why the insane U-turn...?

The Uturn was almost certainly the ship coming back to help after the ramming. It takes forever to turn a large cargo ship around.


13 posted on 06/20/2017 9:00:16 AM PDT by JohnyBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin

My first thought was the MO....ramming folks...like on the streets of Europe... The hour of the day was an advantage.


15 posted on 06/20/2017 9:02:57 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin
Why the insane U-turn...?

Cuz it was DELIBERATE.

There's a story here posted yesterday that shows the timeline as originally reported to be incorrect, and that the ACX ship hit the Fitzgerald with a glancing blow rather than a t-bone.

Here's the link: Mapping the ACX Crystal's collision with the USS Fitzgerald using publicly available info

It shows a picture of the ACX Crystal's bow, and the damage is all on the port side, starting just aft of the bow.

IIRC, the updated theory is the cargo ship was on autopilot, and the strange tracking was actually after the initial collision as the crew of the ACX Crystal awoke and realized what had happened, and returned to render assistance.

Still doesn't excuse the crew of the Fitzgerald, someone screwed up.

16 posted on 06/20/2017 9:03:22 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool - you bet that Tommy sees! - Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin

Really seems like “Nautical Jihad”

Why the insane U-turn...?

Cuz it was DELIBERATE.


No. The container ship was on autopilot in a sea lane. Autopilot was disengaged and the ship turned around once the crew realized something had hit the ship.


26 posted on 06/20/2017 9:16:05 AM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin

I think Matt updated his view of the incident, the wild U-turn was after the collision, not before, so it’s much more understandable.


28 posted on 06/20/2017 9:16:59 AM PDT by Jack Black (Dispossession is an obliteration of memory, of place, and of identity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin
I agree 100% that this was a deliberate crash, either on the U.S. side or the Cargo ship's behalf, not sure..

Does anyone know if either ship's guidance systems can be remotely hacked wirelessly or hijacked by some other means? One of these ships was intentionally steered into the other!

31 posted on 06/20/2017 9:20:14 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Feminism DESTROYED females)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin

Yes, I thought too it was Nautical Jihad. slo-mo van crushing pedestrians/ in another medium.


36 posted on 06/20/2017 9:32:56 AM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson