Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman
On the gun control debate, I’ll extend an olive branch. There are times when the left sort of makes sense about guns. For example, I think we can agree that terrorists should not get their hands on firearms, or at least make it hard for them to do so.

What a COMPLETE naive. Terrorists don't go down the Guns'N'Gold on Broadway and fill out a Form 4473 to buy a gun, moron. They buy them on the black market.

14 posted on 06/20/2017 7:16:39 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Trump won; I celebrated; I'm good. Let's get on with the civil war now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: backwoods-engineer

Black msrket, now they will call you a racist.


21 posted on 06/20/2017 7:20:35 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: backwoods-engineer

Depends on the definition of ‘terrorist.’
Depends on whether or not they have a conviction.
There can be no prior restraint - the vilest Moslem Jihadi is entitled to keep and bear arms until he is arrested and he must be convicted before he loses that right permanently.

This is because the Left would unhesitatingly brand veterans, Tea partiers and NRA members as ‘terrorists’ and put us all on ‘no fly lists’ if that was a means to prevent us from keeping and bearing arms.


27 posted on 06/20/2017 7:25:21 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson