Since we are simply making isht up as we go along, how about we just start removing judges?
We don’t need to remove this judge . . . we need him to oversee Hillary’s trial for gross negligence of confidential governmental communications. There is no “intent” provision in the law of her crimes.
“The law is the law” he says. He would have to convict her. Then he would have to apply the federal conviction guidelines. Those would see her in prison for a nice long time applied regularly
Judge shopping at its best.
How about just ONE Judge with the balls to say to the plaintiff, “This is both a frivolous and absurd suit not to mention a waste of this courts time. Case dismissed, plaintiff to pay court costs in the amount of $500.”