Further: the CO of the ship has standing orders which are reiterated every night that he must be awoken if any contact has a CPA closer than a certain distance of a set number of miles. The distance might vary according to conditions, (traffic, fog, etc), but generally any projected CPA closer than a few miles, and the captain will be on the bridge. The CPA of three miles, for example, might be projected to occur a half hour in the future, but the captain will be brought to the bridge from his at sea cabin which is only a few steps away. And when in doubt: get the captain!
Now, looking at the six turns made by the ACX Crystal, it looks to me as if the person at the helm took the decision to make a U-turn and come back in pursuit of lining up a collision attack against the Fitzgerald. There is no innocent explanation for those six turns ending up in a ramming. There are some reports that the Crystal turned off its AIS radar transponder, radios, and running lights.
Wasn't the captain injured in his cabin? You've made a strong case for the ramming being intentional... which would be supported by the oddity of not reporting the incident for over an hour... but WHAT could possibly be the motive?
Why wasn’t the Captain awakened according to protocol?
“Wasn’t the captain injured in his cabin?”
Travis, if this is true, then the Fitz crew (apparently) failed to follow protocol on a number of different levels.
Otherwise, what reasonable explanation has the Capt in his cabin at the time of impact (unless he went back to retrieve something...)?
The captain’s “at sea” cabin is literally meters from the bridge, so there can be some confusion about where he was.
Sea Jihad.