I like Jay Sekalow. He Fights.
On the other hand I have no use for Chris Wallace.
“On the other hand I have no use for Chris Wallace.”
Me either. He comes across as a whiney liberal little b!tch.
Chris Wallace... I put him in the same category with Whoraldo. I now turn my tv off every time he is on. I can’t stand his obvious bias.
“On the other hand I have no use for Chris Wallace.”
I saw that interview. Wallace would not give Sekalow an opportunity to explain his context, (Wallace would jump in and seize on half of a thought), and Wallace even admitted it at the end, when he said Sekalow should come back and be in the studio where they could be on the same wavelength, if that is the word he used.
Wallace is a petulant shill who struggles with even the simplest acts of fairhandedness when it comes to reporting on President Trump.
It's always, "What happens if that fails....?," he never says, "Wouldn't that be great for the American people. I can't remember having a President so focused on the people."
He's a thinly-veiled anti-Trump whore, and the sight of him turns my stomach.
I've watched him for years now and I saw the interview this morning on Fox News Sunday.
Clearly he and Chris Wallace were not on the same wavelength for pretty much the entire interview. It was almost surreal watching Chris Wallace ask one question with one intent and Jay Sekulow answer a different question with the intent of setting the legal argument before him.
Whether Wallace didn't understand that Sekulow was separating the legal argument from the political implications, or Sekulow didn't clearly communicate (until the end) that he was differentiating the political and legal argguments I'm still somewhat unsure myself.
Like I said, it seemed somewhat surreal that they were both so far off page from each other.
That's how I see it anyway. I'll have to go back and watch it again.
Agree 100%!