Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
Now you would say that the U.S. Supreme Court should have prevented the people of Kansas from making this decision and reaping the resulting benefits.

Yes, because the manner in which it was done trampled on the rights of the owner. The proper way is for the Private enterprise to purchase the land voluntarily, not to use the force of government to deprive people of their rights.

That it was a wonderful economic success is irrelevant. Using government to coerce people for the benefit of a non governmental organization is an example of "crony capitalism" and a too close collusion between government and private enterprise.

This is the fascist model of Nazi Germany.

560 posted on 07/06/2017 12:07:24 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Just come out and say it. You prefer the federal government make those decisions instead of the people in the states. Don’t be ashamed, some people just trust big government that way. you do, I don’t.


561 posted on 07/06/2017 12:20:29 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson