Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
That part not engaged in rebellion against the U.S., yes.

So if it had only been one, you would have accepted the decision of this newly constituted monarchy?

You really do have flexible principles, don't you? :)

I'm not at all surprised that you could come to that conclusion. I would just point out that the Supreme Court recognized the legality of the creation of West Virginia when they ruled in the case of Virginia v. West Virginia (78 U.S. 39) in 1871.

Yeah they ruled in favor of "gay marriage" too. They simply rule along the lines whatever party appointed them wants them to rule.

The 1871 Supreme court was just a bunch of Sock puppets for official federal policy and part of the effort to justify what they had done.

(1871 Supreme Court sock puppets depicted below.)

545 posted on 07/05/2017 6:37:22 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Your contempt for the judiciary is not surprising, and very much in keeping with Jeff Davis and the Confederate congress.


554 posted on 07/06/2017 8:49:47 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson