And here I thought you were a 10th Amendment guy. So that was nothing but a fraud as well? Not at all surprising.
And here I thought you were a 10th Amendment guy. So that was nothing but a fraud as well? Not at all surprising.
You thought Kelo v New London was a good decision by the Supreme court? What are you, nuts?
Kelo v New London was about a city seizing land from one owner and giving it to a business, but not for any Civic or Municiple minded purpose, but instead to "develop" it financially and make a profit.
Eminent Domain is legitimate only if the property seized is for a necessary government service in support of the community.
Kelo was a bad decision, and I can't believe you are citing that and objecting to it's inclusion in a list of very bad supreme court decisions.