Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomStar3028
Thing is the Civil War was caused directly by slavery. Maybe not all of the reason. But very much of it.

Slavery was legal in the Union for "four score and seven years" (actually a couple of years longer than that) so why did it just cause a war in 1861?

I also note that the Union didn't go to war with Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri, or Tennessee, which were Northern slave states. If they were fighting to end slavery, why didn't they start with their own states?

Lincoln launched the war to prevent the South from trading directly with Europe. If normalized European trade with the South had been allowed to develop, it would have wrecked industries in the North East, and it would have severely hurt Washington D.C.'s money flow.

They fought over the money, not whether or not slavery should be abolished. That was something they came up with midway through the war, and then they kept selling it after the fact to justify what they had done.

518 posted on 07/05/2017 4:11:54 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp; DoodleDawg; SamAdams76; x; jmacusa

The cause of the war was the states seceding! The states seceded because of the election of a Republican to the presidency. Why was a Republican candidate so repugnant to the southern states? Because their platform called for the restriction of slavery from the territories. The southern states had threatened to secede in the election of 1856 if the Republican candidate was elected. Come on man, you cannot be this dense.


538 posted on 07/05/2017 5:41:10 PM PDT by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson