Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SSS Two
Whoever wrote this article needs to refer to the southern states’ Articles of Secession if he doesn’t think the Civil War was about slavery. Bizarre revisionism.

It is bizarre revisionism. They way you describe it being about slavery, one would never guess that Slavery would have remained legal in the Union if the South hadn't left.

How can you say it was a fight over slavery when both sides had legal slavery? The Union didn't even give up slavery until December of 1865; Six months after it had been eliminated in the South.

If the Union launched a war to destroy slavery, they should have started in Maryland, where they already had their armies.

Stop the revisionist history.

467 posted on 07/04/2017 2:52:34 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

You’ve been told this before several times on numerous threads. The only way that slavery could be ended in the north was through the amendment process. Lincoln was not a dictator and could not just unilaterally end slavery. He did however encourage congress to write and pass such an amendment which did end slavery in the US.


480 posted on 07/04/2017 6:23:41 PM PDT by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson