Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem
What Lincoln was saying was irrevocable was "that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service."

You twist that to say "slavery was irrevocable".

445 posted on 06/24/2017 9:49:05 PM PDT by HandyDandy ("I reckon so. I guess we all died a little in that damn war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies ]


To: HandyDandy
“What Lincoln was saying was irrevocable was “that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service.””

Your point is well taken. The way you have phrased the meaning of Lincoln's words is better than the way I phrased it.

With permission, I'll amend and re-ask the question from my post 439:

So there was time before the war for the North to prepare a constitutional amendment making irrevocable that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service, but not time to prepare an amendment to abolish slavery?

Enshrinement plus.

450 posted on 06/25/2017 10:20:58 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson