The National Review just can't help but start even positive articles with a negative spin. Blaming President Trump for “a debilitating special-counsel investigation” is like claiming a nun who was brutally raped by an illegal immigrant Muslim from Somalia wanted it. Grow up National Review!
The National Review just can’t help but start even positive articles with a negative spin. Blaming President Trump for a debilitating special-counsel investigation is like claiming a nun who was brutally raped by an illegal immigrant Muslim from Somalia wanted it. Grow up National Review!
When Andrew started his hit attack on President Trump re the hardwired comment, I stopped reading it.
The DC pundits are hard wired in that they can not write an oped with taking shots at Trump.
So they continue to po the 62+ million voters, who will never bother to read their hard wiring against our president.
‘The National Review just can’t help but start even positive articles with a negative spin. Blaming President Trump for a debilitating special-counsel investigation is like claiming a nun who was brutally raped by an illegal immigrant Muslim from Somalia wanted it. Grow up National Review!’
Looks like I’m missing out on some prime bilge by refusing to read anything the fly weight Never-Trumpers at National Review publish. But you slogged through it at least far enough to nail them on yet another piece of Trump-hate-driven ‘analysis.’ I appreciate that—and you’re 100% right. The analogy is perfect; it summed the issue up very well.
First thing I noticed too. Didn’t read further after that smear.