Looks more like a CIA disinformation campaign to me. What’s so Russian about it?
That’s actually a brilliant strategy. Accuse President Trump of colluding with Russia using its America-hating surrogates in the American political/media cesspool to carry its water.
I bet if we look hard enough there are Russian connections to those doing the attacks on trump. I always felt that was the case
I bet if we look hard enough there are Russian connections to those doing the attacks on trump. I always felt that was the case
I can’t get past my feeling that Putin wanted HRC elected.
And the MSM fell for it - HOOK - LINE & SINKER !!!!!
I also wonder if the WH is somehow bugged, or if someone in the WH has an embedded surveillance device. I would hope the Secret Service and President Trump’s security were sophisticated enough to detect it, but ... there are alot of leaks.
I hope behind the scenes propagate, Seth Rich, email server, Clinton Foundation are being investigated by Sessions.
Never made sense that Russians wanted Trump over Hillary. Democrats are too stupid to see that.
I’ve been saying this from the start. The Russians and the DC Swamp are the only winners in this. The Swamp is playing right into the Russian’s hands. Or they are purposefully taking the bait.
Case closed. Communist sympathizers have infiltrated the Lame Stream Media and are destroying the Trump Administration and, with it, the greatness of America. The DemonRATs are their useful idiots along with Americans who have swallowed the Kool Aid. All the while, the Republicans are too occupied with lining their pockets before the Swamp gets drained.
One might ask why the Russians partied when the press said she had won ( in error).
The Russians haven’t enjoyed the neocon and globalist restart of the cold war. This is an Intel community coup attempt.
Absolutely. The Russians would have cleaned Clinton down to her Depends, just like they did Obola. Of course they preferred Clinton.
IOW - if anyone is colluding with the Russians, it’s the LSM....
I’m not buying this.
The Wikileaks source was Seth Rich, a whistleblower within the DNC who was angry over the DNC’s torpedoing of Betnie Sanders and the “anointing” of HRC.
A whistleblower with a passionate motive makes an extremely credible witness and the DNC had every incentive to discredit damaging information coming from Wikileaks.
What better way to discredit Wikileaks than to claim that the source was Russian propaganda?
The MSM was happy to sell the DNC cover story as long as it would hurt Trump who they hate with every fiber of their beings.
This article may offer a new twist - that the Russian propaganda was intended to hurt Trump, not HRC, or perhaps to hurt whoever became president. However, it still reinforces the DNC cover story that it was the Russians, not Seth Rich who was the Wikileaks source.
Don’t buy it folks. They are trying to throw us off the scent.
The source was Seth Rich.
Assange all but said so in his interview with Hannity when he said “Russia is not the source. The source was not a state player.”
Then he say “Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material, often very significant risks. Theres a 27-year-old that works for the DNC who was shot in the back, murdered, just two weeks ago, for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington. So
Don’t buy this - it’s another trick to throw us off the scent.