[sdthree]

It shouldn’t matter if they can or cannot prove the Rich murder. The Justice Department just needs to prove two things:

1) Seth Rich leaked the documents to Wikileaks
2) Russia was not the source of the leaked emails, therefore was not colluding with Trump
3) Obama, Lynch, Comey, Clinton, DWS and others colluded with each other to create the Russian/Trump collusion narrative in order to wage a coup against an elected President.

Those three things should be easy to prove, and would be enough to put them all in jail.

[sdthree]

Sorry, meant 3 things

[txhurl]

You know, you should post the above in its own thread. It really is breaking news.

[Steve_Seattle]

From the WaPo story: "Moreover, Wasserman Schultz, Benardo, and Renteria said they have never been interviewed by the FBI about the matter."

One wonders why not? The article is full of assertions and counter assertions as to whether the FBI trusted the document - some apparently did, and some didn't. If there was significant doubt about the document, why did Comey not withhold judgment, instead using it as a justification for his going public with the status of the email investigation?

If nothing else, this whole affair raises questions about both the competence and the impartiality of the FBI. WHY WERE THESE PEOPLE NOT INTERVIEWED???!!! They've been interviewing everyone in the Trump campaign, yet here we have possible legal and ethical violations in the DOJ and DNC, and they AREN'T interviewed!

[Ray76]

That would require energetic investigation and prosecution. We’ve got Sessions. Nothing is going to get done.