Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yaelle

You are right. Kids are kids and should not be charged with child porn.

_____________________________________________________

If a 16 year old recorded 2 consenting middle-schoolers, and then began showing the video at school, could he be charged with possessing/distributing child-porn? What if he posted it on Facebook?


183 posted on 05/24/2017 7:16:05 PM PDT by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: Bishop_Malachi

He would be charged as a sex offender.


184 posted on 05/24/2017 7:19:32 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: Bishop_Malachi

Yikes, you set up a good scenario for an older teen to be charged with child porn. I agree. If he is filming significantly younger kids, yes. I guess it should be case by case, like the murders where a youth is “tried as an adult.”


189 posted on 05/24/2017 7:31:34 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: Bishop_Malachi
If a 16 year old recorded 2 consenting middle-schoolers, and then began showing the video at school, could he be charged with possessing/distributing child-porn? What if he posted it on Facebook?

Now that's silly Bishop. You know the answer to that strained question. And he would no doubt be tried and convicted as an adult. What was even the point of that question?

213 posted on 05/24/2017 8:17:40 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson