Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Persevero
In this case from what little we know it appears the girl did not do the videotaping, did not know she was being videotaped, did not possess the videotape, and did not distribute the videotape.

How did you jump to those conclusions? Do you think she could not see his cellphone in his hand? Do you think she did not tell him where to prop the cellphone so she could do her duck face in the camera just right. Of course the girl knew! That's how she knew he had the recording. Kids today do this sort of thing because they see everyone else doing it (in their clique).

133 posted on 05/24/2017 5:15:17 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: higgmeister

“How did you jump to those conclusions?”

You’re jumping to the conclusion that it was a hand held cell phone.

Not necessarily at all.

Anyway, I don’t know. If she participated in making the video willingly, then she’s just as guilty for child porn as he is.

If not, then she’s not. That’s what authorities have to look into.

The boy’s behavior seems to indicate to me that he knew he was in deep trouble. It remains possible that he wasn’t, but that’s what his behavior suggests.


173 posted on 05/24/2017 6:50:28 PM PDT by Persevero (Love you guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: higgmeister

“prop the cellphone so she could do her duck face in the camera just right. Of course the girl knew!”

That, however, is a rather extreme jump to a conclusion.


174 posted on 05/24/2017 6:51:11 PM PDT by Persevero (Love you guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson