Posted on 05/22/2017 4:18:59 AM PDT by junkbond
I worked in major medical centers in NY and Boston for many years, and this “doctor” story is simply not credible.
I have been involved directly in the care of foreign leaders, famous entertainers, and at least one high executive branch official who various swamp creatures and others could have wanted dead.
Nobody who works in an ICU - nobody - “follows orders” of the sort supposedly given here. It’s hard to understand, if you don’t live in this world, that people who are mere employees with regard to how many pads of paper they are allowed to order are, simultaneously, absolute monarchs at the bedside, but that’s reality.
I do not believe this story.
"Whistle-blowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks," Assange said. "As a 27-year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington."
When the interviewer interjected that the murder may have been a robbery, Assange pushed back.
"No," he said. "There’s no finding. So… I’m suggesting that our sources take risks."
Then there's the reward Wikileaks is offering for info that nails Rich's killer. No reason to do that unless Rich was an informant.
WikiLeaks @wikileaks
ANNOUNCE: WikiLeaks has decided to issue a US$20k reward for information leading to conviction for the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.
11:58 AM - 9 Aug 2016
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/10/assange-implies-murdered-dnc-staffer-was-wikileaks-source.html
I was speaking on the ultimate end result. Definitely a contributor to No President HRC!
Preach it brother. I would much prefer to see her hanging from a pole, upside down, like Mussolini’s mistress.
I have been waiting for a post like yours. I haven’t bought any of these dr stories; they just didn’t feel right. Also, I’m familiar with the misdirection the left uses. Whenever we’re getting close to something critical, they interject ‘bombshell’ evidence into the discussion. In due time they reveal the bombshell as a hoax, thereby not only discrediting the fake narrative, but the true, crucial elements of the issue as well.
Your post needs to go viral. We’re about to fall prey to the same dishonest tactics the left has used before. They need to be stopped in their tracks before it’s too late.
IOW "Kim Dot Com speaks the truth but revealing our sources is something we just don't do, period. Even if they're murdered we don't reveal them."
You must mean Marc Rich, not to be confused with the late Seth Rich. (No relation that anyone has ever mentioned.)
We walks right up next to saying, "Seth Rich was our source and the DNC found him out and that's why he was murdered.", but then stops and doesn't actually say it.
"Let the discerning reader understand", and as you point out, it doesn't take a lot of discernment to understand really what he means. If I can do it anyone can, I suppose.
Know what I mean? :)
I have been trying to figure what the Trump / Russian issue is?
What is Trump supposed to have done with the Russians, and how it it illegal?
Very off-topic I know, but something just made me think of it again.
You put it so well!
+1
Incredible! And is this headline news? Of course not. Can you IMAGINE if the roles were reversed and Rich was a RNC staffer ? We’d have a special prosecutor investigating Trump, it would be headline news everyday for the next 100 years, “Trump had Rich killed” dirtbags like McCain and Schumer would be demanding impeachment.
I'm not really buying into this Seth Rich murder/blame it on the Russians story. If Rich really was the leaker, and if Podesta and/or the DNC/Hillary had Rich murdered, why would they call for investigations into the "Russians hacking the election" when they would know the investigations would lead to their doorstep? It seems to me that if all this Seth Rich stuff is true, then Hillary, Podesta, the lapdog media, et al would not have started the Russian narrative at all. The prudent thing would be to lay low and blame Hillary's loss on bigoted misogynistic white guys.
Take a true story, (Seth was unfortunately Dead Right There, most likely), and send out a pertaining big lie that can be easily discredited.
And... VOILA! The whole story is thus discredited.
C'mon people, it's the Clintons we're dealing with here. Don't fall for this again.
The narrative was never real, it was a hoax that the willing corrupt media kept on life support.
Never trust those “anons”.
Thank you, you’re very kind.
treasure trove of seth rich murder hillary russian connections
Agree! Also bear in mind that Rich wasn’t the only one. As the election neared, Hillary wasn’t taking any chances. All told, there were at least four Hillary-connected people who died under strange circumstances.
For example, I recall the UN guy who was about to give evidence against Hillary in a bribery case. They first said he died of a heart attack. Then they said he dropped barbells on his throat. In any case, he didn’t testify.
https://www.teaparty.org/chilling-similarities-seth-rich-murder-clinton-body-count-victims-237338/
“DJT obtained a treasure trove of info by firing a blindsided Comey when he was out of town then going in and sweeping the place clean of Comey’s protection racket——seizing damaging accumulated data Comey’s pals now wish he hadn’t saved.”
Trump mentioned recordings of of their conversations in a tweet. What if Trump did not record the conversation, but it was Comey that recorded the conversation, and trump just confiscated it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.