Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

They could step up to the 6.5 Grendel and still stay with the AR platform.

Grendel carbines and DMR rifles actually weigh a few ounces less than 5.56mm guns because the bore is bigger and there is less barrel steel to tote up the hill.

What would it take to convert millions and millions of M4 and M16 rifles to 6.5 Grendel? In theory, just a barrel, a bolt, and a magazine. The cartridge produces more recoil than the 5.56, but not so much more that it requires a new buffer or scope/accessory mounts.

1 posted on 05/20/2017 9:07:10 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Elderberry

6.5 is a great caliber and has the sectional density. Its “stacked”.

Used in silhouette for long range.


2 posted on 05/20/2017 9:15:34 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Ignorance is reparable, stupid is forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

Cut to the chase. Go back to 30 caliber.

Cut the weight with modern stock design and smart action engineering.

The old .308 was pretty good. The OLD 30-06 is still a very lethal long range cartridge.


3 posted on 05/20/2017 9:22:30 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

I hunt with .257 Weatherby (listed in the 6.5 category). Can’t say enough about 6.5mm. It’s time has come.


5 posted on 05/20/2017 9:37:18 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry
It seems that every first-world nation (and a few backbenchers) figured out that something between 6mm and 7mm was probably the answer for a general-issue military cartridge caliber, and they figured it out 50-100 years ago. Bean counters, politicians and military-industrial complexes have done a remarkable job trying to make do with smaller and larger bores.

Maybe the current experts can average out all the world's battle rifle cartridges, in which case we will have something perfect for the next average war fought against average enemies in an average environment.

Mr. niteowl77

6 posted on 05/20/2017 9:40:58 AM PDT by niteowl77 (Trust- but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

If the bad guys are much more than 300 meters out they should be killed with something else. Because they are tough to see, if for no other reason.

Closer in, you’ll want all the ammo you can carry. So why use heavier ammo?

I’d rather put my money (but with less weight penalty) on better sights; which is exactly what has been happening slowly but surely to our boy’s equipment since Gulf war 1.

C.W.


7 posted on 05/20/2017 9:44:32 AM PDT by colderwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

The Stoner design needs to find itself assigned to the history books. No battle rifle should be in use for more than 50 years by the best military in the world.

While the design has been improved for reliability and accuracy, it is holding our troops back.

The 6.5mm is capable of great long-range accuracy, lethality and compactness......depending on which cartridge it is loaded into.

With a variety of bullet weights, it can work in close quarters or at longer distances.

The Stoner rifles are needless heavy by today’s standards and can be lightened with modern materials.

I look forward to a new cartridge and a new rifle.


12 posted on 05/20/2017 10:09:38 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The largest and most dangerous hate-group in the US is now the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

20 posted on 05/20/2017 10:46:03 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry
Looks like I'm gonna need another safe and a pallet of ammo cans.
21 posted on 05/20/2017 10:55:44 AM PDT by kitchen (If you are a violin bow maker or restorer please ping me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry
XM8 photo: xm8 xm8.jpg

Not invented here so was turned down.

25 posted on 05/20/2017 11:30:52 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

ping

(added “banglist” to key words)


28 posted on 05/20/2017 11:38:49 AM PDT by 2111USMC (Aim Small Miss Small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

MK 262 Mod 1 will shoot accurately all day long at 300 to 500 meters if you have an 18 to 20 inch barrel. If most of the bad guys were wearing body armor, you’d probably want a larger caliber, though.


33 posted on 05/20/2017 12:31:20 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

I can’t believe no one has picked apart this line:

“As most of our enemies are shooting 7.62mm-based firearms such as former Soviet or Iraqi AKs, SKSs, Druganovs, and PKMs, they actually have a deadlier reach than our troops’.”

Sorry, while this may be true for the Dragunov (not Druganov) and PKM, which are 7.62x54R, it is absolutely NOT true for the 7.62x39 AK and SKS, which have an effective range of around 200m-300m. An AR would generally be preferable by all accounts I’ve seen.


34 posted on 05/20/2017 12:35:23 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

British .303 bolt action.

If it was good enough for Rorke’s Drift, it should be good enough for a Muzzi (if you dip it in pig’s blood first.

Back them up with Tommy guns with 50 round drums for suppression.


36 posted on 05/20/2017 12:54:36 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

Everyone missed the obvious point. If the army gets away from the AR platform then it loses its status as a “weapon of war”. The liberals/gun grabbers also lose their case in which to ban the rifle based on it being a “weapon of war”.


41 posted on 05/20/2017 1:18:38 PM PDT by Purdue77 (I can't afford a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

That makes too much sense so it’s not gonna happen. The military industrial complex will want to make more money by selling a whole new rifle and caliber.


43 posted on 05/20/2017 1:26:32 PM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

Cartridge-related religious wars aside, the last time they went through this the program went Tango Uniform because DoD insisted on a replacement that had double the reliability of the M4 platform. But after 50 years of battle-testing and upgrades, Stoner’s dinosaur on average is running 3600 MRBS. Good luck finding anything that’ll run double that once it’s in the hands of Pvt. Snuffy and being operated under battlefield conditions.

So unless they lower their standards this time, it’ll likely be SSDD.


45 posted on 05/20/2017 1:46:51 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

Probably the easiest thing would be to just go to the .243X45. Go with a fast twist and whatever bullets work best. Also keep the barrel at least 20 inches even if you have to go to a bull pup.


55 posted on 05/20/2017 2:32:51 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

it may be time to hang up the Stoner-designed rifles.
= = =

Well, then the AR’s will not be evil Military any more, right?


58 posted on 05/20/2017 2:53:24 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Brought to you from Turtle Island, otherwise known as 'So-Called North America')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

Projectile weapons are so last century.


62 posted on 05/20/2017 9:39:27 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

Just move up to 7.62 NATO. That saves the ammunition production headaches of starting up a new caliber and keeps any ammo reserves viable.


69 posted on 05/21/2017 6:37:24 AM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson