Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t you have to have evidence of a crime before you call for a special prosecutor?


4 posted on 05/10/2017 11:05:50 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: virgil
The reason for a special prosecutor would be you have evidence of something.

These people don't have any evidence of anything after looking for over six months. I keep hearing the media say that the investigation has to keep going because they haven't found anything to nail Trump with yet.

And therein lies the real reason for this Russian collusion investigation. If the democRATS look long enough, they are certain they will find some evidence.

In the absence of finding any evidence, they will fabricate something to make Trump look guilty of winning because of the Russian influence.

The special prosecutor needs to look into Bill and Hillary's Russian connections because there is hard evidence already publicly known that would warrant that.

But in the absence of any evidence or proof of Trump colluding with the Russians, this is all a fishing expedition to take the focus off of the Clinton's crimes.

16 posted on 05/10/2017 1:44:15 PM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson