To: rollo tomasi
Well, in my state it is pretty much a 50/50 property division and unless the dude makes 6 figures, it is not an alimony case.
Now my most recent victories have been men who I helped get their kids away from a meth head mom and a mom who wanted to move them away.
So, you and your preconceived notions are a little off.
119 posted on
05/12/2017 4:59:15 PM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: yldstrk
Good deal, however I don't agree with 50/50 or the subjectives opinions of Family Court judges ripping the innocent party to shreds in order to create some line of fairness. No-fault divorce is an abomination. Some States are alright such as Michigan, but no-fault resulted in Oklahoma in the mid-50s because nouveau-rich oil bums wanted to drop their wives that supported them throughout the marriage and exchange those faithful partners with bimbo manipulative gold-diggers.
A partner breaks a contract, then they don't deserve 50 or even 80% and custody should have the same percentages. Why? Because you are conditioning the next generation that marriage vows are not worth squat.
120 posted on
05/19/2017 6:13:02 AM PDT by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson