Get Yates to testify under oath.
She testified she knew nothing
Judicial group has already subpoena his emails for this time period
I don’t like Yates.
Plus, she’s got a neck like Jar Jar Binks.
But when I watched her today, she sure seemed composed.
One thing about President Trump he is out in the open with his tweets.
Lying to Congress (or the FBI) is a crime regardless of whether a person is under oath.
Lindsay Graham asked. The witness fingered no one and denied it was them, but agreeing that someone did unmask Americans in an incidental collection and fed it to the WAPO.
Klapper is very polite and lumbering, but seems to me his answers all day long indicate he is asking the committee today to look at Comey for news leaks. Don’t ask me the specifics of just what he said, because it was manifested by a hand wave and he admittedly alluded to speculation.
Yates is articulate as opposed to Klapper and comports herself very well, but like all liberals, her feelings clearly counted for her obscene decision to cooperate with the Sessions Justice Department, believing in her own universe that enforcing immigration law was unconstitutional, thus she was summarily fired.
She says that she warned the WH but never says that she talked to the senate who had confirmation hearings. So, whats with that. Why wouldn’t they bring it to the confirmation hearings. You don’t have to be called to give input. So did the senators ignore it. Or did they try to disrupt Trump without letting on that they were subversives.
I do think she was the leaker...and all her little moves were made to conform with what she was going to create for the meeting on the 26th, 27th etc. until she got her a** booted on the 30th.
Fire Comey unless he reveals the leakers.
According to published reports, someone was eavesdropping, and recording, the conversations of Michael Flynn, while Sally Yates was at the Department of Justice. Sally Yates knew about this eavesdropping, listened in herself (Pellicano-style for those who remember the infamous LA cases), and reported what she heard to others.
For Yates to have such access means she herself must have been involved in authorizing its disclosure to political appointees, since she herself is such a political appointee. What justification was there for an Obama appointee to be spying on the conversations of a future Trump appointee?
http://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3525535/posts?page=1