Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

Let’s just hypothetically say we DO have Rods from God.

Currently such devices are not banned by international treaty.

Should one be used, however, you can be certain that the dust would not even have settled and there would be motions at the UN to ban such a device.

It would mean that we would only have one shot at using them, so it better be a damned important target.

This would only be a concern if we actually had Rods from God, which we don’t.

I promise.


49 posted on 05/08/2017 11:00:29 AM PDT by Crusher138 ("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Crusher138

What if... the UN were to contract a sudden case of titanium poisoning right before they convened to outlaw them? If we ever developed them, of course.


55 posted on 05/08/2017 11:05:47 AM PDT by txhurl (BOOM BOOM! - what is it - :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Crusher138

“Should one be used, however, you can be certain that the dust would not even have settled and there would be motions at the UN to ban such a device.”

They would vote to ban.

We will ignore the vote.


69 posted on 05/08/2017 11:31:12 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Crusher138

Why not spent plutonium rods?


74 posted on 05/08/2017 11:36:11 AM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition mobile devices. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Crusher138

And we should give a damn what the UN thinks? Why????


90 posted on 05/08/2017 12:15:40 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Crusher138

Space weapons were banned in 1967 by treaty.


119 posted on 05/08/2017 2:26:12 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Crusher138; ClearCase_guy

To be effective, shouldn’t Rods from God be smart?


121 posted on 05/08/2017 2:38:07 PM PDT by Thibodeaux (the long night is over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Crusher138

Plausible deniability for a vaporized impact weapon. Shooting star just happened to hit something...


130 posted on 05/08/2017 6:37:54 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Crusher138

Then the thing to do would be to hit UN first then the target /s in case NSA is looking


133 posted on 05/08/2017 9:51:23 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Crusher138

Do the UN first???


139 posted on 05/09/2017 12:22:03 PM PDT by MIA_eccl1212 (10 rounds 10 meters 10 seconds 10 centimeters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson