Replies

Oh, “Europe” is defined all right, especially in the context of “ever closer union” (destruction of national sovereignty), “respect for the principles of the United Nations charter” (a document that is based on the 1936 USSR constitution), and the “social market economy” versus the free market.

Your stereotypes and disparaging tone are noted.

If the people of a sovereign nation decide as the sovereign that they want to share their souvereignty with other to date soverein nations I can not find anything malicious in it. In France 33% (Votes for le Pen) of the voters want the national solution and 66% (votes for Macron) voted for a united Europe. Geerd Wilders lost in the Netherlands and the AfD lost in Nordrheinwestfalen, the biggest state of Germany. And guess what: Jarosław Kaczyński of Poland talked about a united European military with a nuclear arm. A united Europe was an idea of Churchill (but without his island), that was later adapted by Adenauer and de Gaulle. The USSR has nothing to do with it. Even if it would it would be irrelevant today. A united Europe is in the interest of 350 Million Europeans. Therefore we will unite it. Regards Andreas P.S. I do not want to provoke, but your arumentations have nothing to to with the contemporary European mood.