Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress plans to cancel Obama's government pension following news of $400,000 speaking fees...
Daily Mail ^ | 5/5/17 | David Martosko

Posted on 05/05/2017 10:27:02 AM PDT by Textide

Congress could soon throw a monkey-wrench into Barack Obama's retirement finances, yanking his presidential pension since he is reportedly cashing in with six-figure speaking fees.

Former presidents currently receive $207,800 per year, the same amount cabinet secretaries are paid.

But lawmakers are considering a move to shrink that payment – dollar for dollar – for Oval Office retirees who collect more than $400,000 in income.

Last year Obama vetoed a bill that did just that.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: flotusmichelle; obama; x44
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Textide

Im no fan of Obama, but iit doesn’t look good. The democrats will love to say republicans will go after old people’s pensions, just look what they did to that poor old Barack Obama. I bet Hillary gets a pension for having been Secretary of State, Bill Clinton gets one and look how he rakes it in. If they do it because of Obama it will look bad.


21 posted on 05/05/2017 10:44:47 AM PDT by webheart (All comments are considered to be sarcasm unless otherwise noted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

WTF? Talk about a distraction.

Fed.gov is $20 Trillion in debt. We have out-of-control government at all levels, and leftists battling conservatives at every turn.

And they want to fight a media battle over Obama’s $208K pension?


22 posted on 05/05/2017 10:45:41 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

works for me


23 posted on 05/05/2017 10:49:06 AM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

They should just let it go. It won’t make any difference to either Obama or the Federal budget.


24 posted on 05/05/2017 10:49:58 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

>>It’s a law that should be passed, but it will only effect future retirees from the office. Sucks, but there it is.<<

The argument can be: what is the date of the pension agreement?

Example: Here in Dallas they have passed laws that significantly change the Police pension plan, including key items such as payouts and contribution rates. These affect MANY current pensioners.

If they can pass laws affecting current police pensioners’ access to their pension plan, I am sure Congress can do the same (since the ex pos factos law also applies to States and municipalities).

It isn’t a cut and dried as people think.


25 posted on 05/05/2017 10:50:04 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (The Civil Rights movement compared content of their character to skin color and chose the latter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Textide

NO DC SOB SHOULD GET A PENSION NOR LIFE LONG PERKS. They don’t even deserve what they are getting paid for being in office. The DC shakedown is like and kind to paying criminal thugs for life for robbing you and the thug setting the amount you pay them. Seriously, is there a difference?


26 posted on 05/05/2017 10:50:56 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

This is dumb grandstanding and will be a distraction from vastly more important issues. It will also whip up Obama’s base and allow his spokesdrones to further accuse the GOP of being racist.


27 posted on 05/05/2017 10:53:34 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

maybe it’s time to do that. Pensions are for retired people. If a former president is speechifying at twice his pension, he’s not retired. Where else does one get a $200K pension for 4 or 7 years’ work?


28 posted on 05/05/2017 10:54:33 AM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Are those changes retroactive to current retirees or only going forward and are they defined benefit or defined contribution plans?


29 posted on 05/05/2017 10:58:16 AM PDT by Valpal1 (I am enjoying the lamentations of their girly-men on social media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

You know this, but here is Fireman case, May 1 2017

Keep in mind that retirement is often based on last year’s salary, including overtime.

“We are short on firefighters, and are trying to hire. We ask for volunteers to do the overtime, so they are not forced to give up their time off.”

Lots of times a retiring Captain is given first chance at overtime, just for this purpose.

https://blog.transparentcalifornia.com/2017/05/01/la-firefighter-trio-earns-nearly-1-million-in-ot-pay-again/

Three Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) employees earned a combined $1.36 million last year — $974,779 of which came from overtime pay alone, according to just-released 2016 salary data from TransparentCalifornia.com.

Unsurprisingly, the LAFD trio earned the three largest overtime payouts of the more than 600,000 workers surveyed statewide:

Fire captain Charles Ferrari received $334,655 in OT, with total earnings of $469,198.
Fire captain James Vlach received $332,583 in OT, with total earnings of $469,158.
Firefighter Donn Thompson received $307,542 in OT, with total earnings of $424,913.


30 posted on 05/05/2017 11:04:14 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Brought to you from Turtle Island, otherwise known as 'So-Called North America')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Textide
'Tho promised to give a % to charities, probably the Obama Foundation, the couple who want Socialism for everyone else...except them:

(The Obamas are getting a record-setting book deal worth at least $60 million)

The Truman's showed a lot of class by their restraint from the 'hi-life".

31 posted on 05/05/2017 11:07:27 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
There most certainly was a huge brouhaha when the impeached, disbarred Clinton left office.

<><> Clinton wanted taxpayers to subsidize him in a posh expensive office suite ..... but taxpayers said no. He ended up w/ offices in Harlem.

<><> his first speech exploiting the presidency (to a financial firm) caused a massive outcry....the guy who arranged to have Clinton speak was fired.

=============================================

Obamacare is a stupid failed scam that depended on the stupidity of the American people to get passed (according to architect Jonathan Gruber). From the get go....Obama lied about the plan to dupe Americans. Democrats jumped onboard and continued the Obamacare charade.

It's beyond rational thinking to contemplate that the Cantor-Fitzgerald brokerage is paying Obama a four hundred thou speaking fee to speak as if he is an expert about "healthcare."

Cantor Fitzgerald
110 E 59th St
New York, NY 10022
TELE (212) 938-5000
EMAIL PAGE http://www.cantor.com/contact

32 posted on 05/05/2017 11:14:15 AM PDT by Liz (Shutting down conservatives' free speech is a form of hate speech. samtheman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Textide

This is silly. He earned that pension. And whatever businesses wish to pay him now for his services, that’s up to them. Honor your contracts, Congress.


33 posted on 05/05/2017 11:17:55 AM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Pensions are for people who fulfilled the requirements. He’s an ex-president, he gets the cash. When my wife hits her 80 points she’ll leave her ASRS points accruing spot and start collecting that pension, but she will not be retiring (because she doesn’t want to, because she’s crazy).


34 posted on 05/05/2017 11:22:22 AM PDT by discostu (Stand up and be counted, for what you are about to receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
He earned that pension.

huh face photo: huh huh.jpg
35 posted on 05/05/2017 11:25:27 AM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Textide

I would have no problem making the pensions of presidents and Congress critters very good, and all of them with a provision that the benefit amount equals a stated benefit, minus their annual income from other sources. The pension would then go mostly only to presidents who do not financially exploit their former presidency; giving financial support when it is needed, but not otherwise.

I would also remove ALL secret service protection from ALL former presidents. It makes them a class like royalty, which they are not.


36 posted on 05/05/2017 12:29:15 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

Ex-presidents received almost no kind of consideration at all until 1958. Harry Truman’s relative poverty was a motivating factor, I believe.


37 posted on 05/05/2017 12:37:52 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

President Trump will have a sly smile on his face as he signs this bill into law. More winning!


38 posted on 05/05/2017 1:22:01 PM PDT by upchuck (Greed is a word leftists use to describe what conservatives call ambition. h/t Mike Rosen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Easy, do it the Dem way...

95% tax on presidential speaking fees for the amount above the Presidential pension.

(D)s have been pressing for this tax rate for a while, tell them this is a test case...:^)


39 posted on 05/05/2017 1:55:29 PM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

>>Are those changes retroactive to current retirees or only going forward and are they defined benefit or defined contribution plans?<<

Defined benefit and retroactive to current pensioners (retirees).

There is something different about pensions than most contracts. There are probably a lot of weasel “subject to” words about what is REALLY can be paid after retirement. I think the employee contribution is the only thing that is legally protected.


40 posted on 05/05/2017 4:39:50 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The Civil Rights movement compared content of their character to skin color and chose the latter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson