Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Having been a clerk in that court,...

I'm impressed! Who did you clerk for?

13 posted on 05/03/2017 8:53:23 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Road Warrior ‘04

Think was referring to Gorsuch having been a clerk on the court in the past. Gorsuch is familiar with the process and may not like it.


14 posted on 05/03/2017 8:59:31 AM PDT by LoneStarGI (Vegetarian: Old Indian word for "BAD HUNTER.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Road Warrior ‘04

Actually, the rule in grammar is that the modifying clause be related to the noun that is closest to it.

I wrote: “Having been a clerk in that court, Gorsuch probably knows...”

The clause relates to Gorsuch. It is not a dangling modifier.

The pronoun “I” does not appear anyplace in the sentence.


18 posted on 05/03/2017 9:17:52 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Road Warrior ‘04; xzins
"Having been a clerk in that court,..."

I'm impressed! Who did you clerk for?

No, the phrase was correctly used to modify the subject of the sentence, which was Gorsuch.

28 posted on 05/06/2017 8:30:11 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("We will be one people, under one God, saluting one American flag." --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson