Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I would say it is a bit of both.


12 posted on 05/02/2017 1:50:56 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: expat2

I’m with you, it is not black and white, either or. I would say the average direction of your financial state is a function of work ethic. A person born to poverty and a poor work ethic will stay poor while a person born poor but with a good work ethic will move upward at a rate commiserate with their talents. On the other side someone born wealthy but with a poor work ethic will have their wealth decline with a rate determined by their vices while someone born wealthy with a good work ethic will maintain or improve on their wealth depending on their own talents.

Random factors like accidental setbacks and opportunities available also play a role, but mostly are perturbations on the larger trajectory. Wealth also grows somewhat exponentially since as you gain more wealth a larger and larger portion tends to be invested in sources of wealth and not into consumption.

At a societal level though, we cannot excuse and encourage sloth by blaming someone’s conditions. We must encourage hard work and remind everyone they can move forward based on what they do with what they have. The Democrat way fails on both counts.


31 posted on 05/03/2017 11:45:38 AM PDT by Flying Circus (God help us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson