Posted on 04/28/2017 2:31:07 PM PDT by fwdude
Subheader: The stereotype of an exclusively female orientation has been exploded
It makes for an illogical syllogism.
Premise A: Lesbians are sexually attracted to women only.
Premise B: Women cannot impregnate women.
Conclusion: Lesbians have higher pregnancy rates than non-lesbian women.
It’s contrary to all reason, but it's true. Lesbians have significantly higher pregnancy rates than their heterosexual peers. It’s also true for teen gay males. They are substantially more likely to impregnate their sexual partners than are heterosexual males.
(Excerpt) Read more at mercatornet.com ...
“Lesbians have higher pregnancy rates than non-lesbian women.”
Maybe because there aren’t that many?
How would that affect the rate?
Laz, know anything about this?
Wait! Teen gay males have a higher percentage
than regular males of impregnating their partners???
This. Does. Not. Compute.
How exactly are gay males impregnating their partners? Am I missing something? Lesbians can use turkey basters, but gay males would have gay male partners, right?
I believe this is the logical over-compensation of freaks “playing normal” - they’re just behind a bit as more and more “normal” couldn’t be bothered with children.
You’d like to think so unless we are back at transgender heaven.
Silly man of course it does. The partner felt that she was a male when the gay teenager impregnated him. See?
Because they’re not using birth control?
It didn’t compute with me either, but not much about these people computes with me, so I thought nothing of it.
I read an article recently about a couple who had a baby together. Sounds normal, right? No, we can’t have normal these days. They were two very confused people (the female in the relationship was sporting a penis, and the male in the relationship was actually female....the made-up term for it is transgender). So, the “mom” actually impregnated the “dad” and the “dad” went through with two pregnancies. They have two sons who are going to be in for a huge surprise, and, I suspect, a lot of anger when they realize what sad cases their parents are.
David Crosby has enough offspring as it is. Who’s he trying to beat, Brigham Young?
Premise A ... dykes like dykes
Premise B ... women cannot impregnate each other
Conclusion ... dykes have higher pregnancy rates than straight women do
The writer must have slept through his Logic class. The conclusion cannot be formed from these premises. Dummy.
From the article:
“sexual-minority youth aged fourteen to nineteen have pregnancy rates two to seven times greater than their heterosexual peers. Their pregnancy rates continue to rise, even though the overall teen pregnancy rate is declining in the United States.”
They are talking about high school girls.
They might be talking about closet gayspace impregnating a woman before they come out or something.
I think HOW is the question.
(No, we’ve heard...)
but why children?....homo men can not impregnate homo boyfriends and home women can not impregnate homo girlfriends...
if they truly are against sexual relations with the opposite sex, then carry it thru....NO CHILDREN....its against all of nature for these abnormal people to raise children....
This. Does. Not. Compute.
Well, more lawyers keep cropping up, someone is breeding them....
To qualify for welfare.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.