Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Tax Expert's Take on Trump's Proposal: 'A Truly Great Tax Plan'
American Thinker ^ | April 28, 2017 | Jack Hellner

Posted on 04/28/2017 8:45:40 AM PDT by detective

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Another good move by Trump.
1 posted on 04/28/2017 8:45:40 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

This is only a bad idea to those who want to use tax policy to control behavior.
The deficit will be a continuing problem until it isn’t. The youth should be the ones complaining but they are out in the streets protesting for more. It’s merely our job to show some tough love by denying it. Snowflakes gotta melt.


2 posted on 04/28/2017 8:48:57 AM PDT by griswold3 (2%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
This is only a bad idea to those who want to use tax policy to control behavior.

Well, I expect the Democrats to oppose it.

And the Republicans.

3 posted on 04/28/2017 8:52:09 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: detective

Why does it take a brain surgeon to figure out that lower taxes means you keep more of your money. And you might even figure out that tax cuts also means lowering costs which means lower prices. So you keep more of your own many and it goes further than it used to.

As far as you’re concerned, your economics are greatly befitted by tax cuts. A great plan as far as you’re concerned.


4 posted on 04/28/2017 8:53:19 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
I was a sole proprietor for almost 50 years. The more money I made, the more they took.

That straight 15% sure looks good for small businesses in particular.....assuming one could still take regular deductions for expenses.

5 posted on 04/28/2017 8:53:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

“This is only a bad idea to those who want to use tax policy to control behavior.”

Yep. To make them kings and make them the only route to get blessed (of course they get their cut) to do anything with creating individual prosperity.


6 posted on 04/28/2017 8:54:02 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (WKU 2016 Boca Raton Bowl Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
The more money I made, the more they took.

It is enough to take the wind out of most people's sails.

7 posted on 04/28/2017 8:55:59 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: detective
You are right. President Trump seems to have gotten into some of the Republicans minds and woke them up. Still a lot of GOPe in the party that needs to go.
8 posted on 04/28/2017 8:56:52 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Yesterday our brothers and sisters on DU were lamenting the loss of the property tax deduction in favor of a larger deduction (which everyone gets). Apparently the railing against large houses, ‘the rich’, carbon footprints, ‘regressive taxes’ (the more your house costs the more you can deduct), was just a fabrication.


9 posted on 04/28/2017 8:58:15 AM PDT by posterchild (Treade a worme on the tayle, and it must turne agayne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Any plan that lets all American’s keep more of what they earn through the sweat of their brow is Good for America.


10 posted on 04/28/2017 8:59:23 AM PDT by mainestategop (DonÂ’t Let Freedom Slip Away! After America , There is No Place to Go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

...give everyone the incentive to earn more instead of spending so much time and money trying to beat the tax man.


Does this mean accountants are going to hate it? :-)


11 posted on 04/28/2017 8:59:44 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

Middle class can be hit really hard by no medical deductibles.


12 posted on 04/28/2017 9:00:17 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: detective
The Tax Plan along with the ongoing deregulation will probably touch off a pretty good boom if Trump doesn't strangle world trade. I think if he does tariffize everything and it has bad effects he will change that. The man is practical if nothing else.

A much better treatment of taxes would be to do it by Constitutional Amendment and do a low (my magic umber is 9% for reasons historic, rational, and some irrational) and no exempts, deducts, or credits-9% from the first dollar of earned income, or a low uniform tariff all coupled with elimination of business taxes of all kinds or no more than a nominal 1%. The liability of this approach is that there would be entirely too much revenue flow to the Federal Government once the economy has blasted off.

13 posted on 04/28/2017 9:01:08 AM PDT by ThanhPhero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
His plan will probably hurt me. It gets rid of the AMT, but it also gets rid of a number of state tax deductions that the AMT was partially getting rid of before. I don't have any mortgages, so that isn't any help to me. As an old f@rt I've paid all of them off so my biggest threat is property taxes, and that deduction is going away.

All that being said, we have a "Consumer expert" on the radio here in Atlanta named Clark Howard. He says that the tax plan is NOT revenue neutral but results in the government losing money. He's full of merde:

  1. Why is "revenue neutral" a good thing? So what if the government takes in less money. LET THEM SPEND LESS! and it will be "Revenue Neutral."
  2. Old Clarkie boy doesn't take into account the increased economic growth caused by the government plundering less of the economy. Left to the individuals to spend as they see fit rather than on endless central planning soviet style government programs, the economy will actually grow. and the reduced rate of a larger economy will probably bring in MORE pelf to the government.

14 posted on 04/28/2017 9:02:41 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Perhaps - but that wasn’t their lament. Do medical deductibles and other deductibles in aggregate typically exceed what the new base deductible will be for everyone?


15 posted on 04/28/2017 9:02:56 AM PDT by posterchild (Treade a worme on the tayle, and it must turne agayne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: detective

A flat tax needs to be instituted by Constitutional Amendment. Any arrangement passed by Congress, no matter how good it is, will be repeatedly fiddled with and added to and warped to progressively handicap business and discourage savings and work until we have to have another “tax reform.”


16 posted on 04/28/2017 9:06:13 AM PDT by ThanhPhero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

ABSOLUTELy.

It doesnt take much illness to hit that deductible for a single person.

What about people withdrawing from their IRA to pay for medical..Including nursing home care

Middle class will be hardest hit because of it. I hope congress vetoes anything like this.

If child care gets to be accounted for thanks to ivanka..then so can medical


17 posted on 04/28/2017 9:11:41 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
Excellent! I add a little to your comment.

This is only a bad idea to those who want to use tax policy to control behavior, to reward bad behavior and punish the productive citizens.

18 posted on 04/28/2017 9:11:50 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ("Fake news is just another name for slander or libel, and should be prosecuted."!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

It means their clients will end up with more beans for the accountants to count - the accountants will be ok.

They will take care of themselves. All you have to do is look at the incredible proliferation of new accounting pronouncements and new required financial statement notes in recent years to understand.


19 posted on 04/28/2017 9:13:04 AM PDT by RatRipper (The biggest threat to US national security is our government and those in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: detective; GregNH; LucyT; LS; 2ndDivisionVet; appalachian_dweller; aragorn; ...

PING!!!

This is the most intelligent tax policy I have seen since Ronald Reagan’s and my initial thoughts make me believe that it is better than Reagan’s.

Article and ALL comments.esp #2 and #18
This is only a bad idea to those who want to use tax policy to control behavior, to reward bad behavior and punish the productive citizens.

thanks, detective


20 posted on 04/28/2017 9:13:37 AM PDT by Whenifhow (when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson