Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fitzy_888
"...suddenly an airship looks like a very cheap alternative."

Except for such an application, you don't need a "huge" airship.

8 posted on 04/26/2017 10:16:59 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog

They don’t say how big the one he’s actually building is.

Being near neutrally bouyant it doesn’t have to devote thrust to generate lift. To loiter it only needs to combat the prevailing wind.

If you wanted to loiter over a metropolitan area for weeks or fly intercontinental you’d need crew quarter for two or three shifts of pilots and technicians. You’d need a massive fuel capacity. The crew might serve like they do on an oil rig, three weeks at a time.

Otherwise, yes the space for radio equipment and powering it is a trivial concern.

If I were Sergey and had money to burn I’d consider this and know everywhere the airship went it would generate hoopla...and eat Verizon and AT&T’s lunch.


15 posted on 04/26/2017 3:40:15 PM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson