Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Debuts New S-97 Raider Light Tactical Helicopter Video in Marketing Push
The Aviationist ^ | APRIL 21, 2017

Posted on 04/23/2017 4:58:06 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Proposed Helicopter Would Replace MH-6/AH-6 Little Bird if Adopted.

Lockheed Martin has released a new promotional video showing the S-97 Raider light tactical helicopter demonstrating many of its unique performance capabilities.

The S-97 Raider, if adopted by the U.S. military, would replace the aging family of MH-6/AH-6 Little Bird helicopters widely used since the Vietnam conflict as special operations and observation/light attack helicopters. The MH-6/AH-6 family first flew in 1963 making it a legacy platform that has been continuously updated for expanded roles. Most airframes in U.S. service are now aging and, because a light tactical helicopter is subjected to high stresses in operational and training use the older aircraft are approaching the end of their structural lifespan.

The new S-97 Raider is a significant technology update over previous light attack/observation helicopters. It uses a mostly carbon fiber composite fuselage like the MV-22 Osprey. The S-97 has much higher performance than the MH-6/AH-6 family, more internal space for up to 6 combat equipped troops, a unique co-axial rotor system and a host of additional technological advancements. Lockheed-Martin is firstly and specifically configuring the S-97 as a replacement of the U.S. Special Operations Command MH-6M Little Bird. The significant difference in top speeds between the MH-6M at only 175 MPH and the new S-97 at 276 MPH is just one example of the massive performance and capability improvement available with Lockheed-Martin’s new platform.

Innovative performance features of the new Lockheed-Martin/Sikorsky S-97 Raider. (LM)

Another key performance enhancement is that the S-97 program has greatly improved “hot, high and heavy” rotary wing performance. Helicopters often struggle with performance at high altitude in hot weather conditions and can become vulnerable to performance problems like “vortex ring state”. Vortex ring state likely contributed to the controlled crash of a highly modified U.S. special operations helicopter, the MH-X Stealth Black Hawk, during the May 2, 2011 raid to apprehend Osama bin Laden, Operation Neptune Spear.

Few years ago The Aviationist pointed out some similarities in the possible shape of the MH-X and the S-97.

The new S-97 has already demonstrated stable, controllable hover capability at 6,000 feet AGL and 95° Fahrenheit. The aircraft has also maneuvered at speed to 3g’s.

The co-axial or contra-rotating main rotors on the S-97 were originally conceived by Russian engineer Mikhail Lomonosov. This design has been proven on Russian designs including the successfully deployed newer Kamov KA-50 and KA-52 attack helicopters and much older designs like the KA-27 family of Kamov helicopters widely used in different versions in both military and commercial roles mostly by the Russians.

Contra-rotating main rotors were first developed and employed by the Russians including this Kamov KA-50 attack. (image credit: Russian Aviation Photography)

Advantages to a co-axial rotor system include equalizing the effects of torque compared to helicopters with one-directional large rotating blades or “rotary wings”. Helicopters with a single large rotor system have a tendency to “pull” or rotate in the direction of the main rotor blades’ rotation. To counteract the rotational force of a single main rotor the smaller tail rotor is mounted sideways as is conventionally seen on helicopters. The tail rotor on the new S-97 Raider is rear-facing, adding more thrust than a conventional sideways mounted rotor and contributing to the S-97’s higher top speed.

The S-97 Raider program was initially started to replace the aging OH-58 Kiowa Warrior observation helicopter under a then-$16 billion U.S. Army acquisition program named “Armed Aerial Scout.”

The program was put on hold prior to the U.S. Presidential election due to budgetary constraints. Sikorsky, the originator of the program, teamed with Lockheed-Martin to continue the program and adjusted the marketing focus to a broader mission set.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; helicopter; lockheedmartin; s97
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: chrisser
patient transport

Exactly. I watched a life flight chopper drop down between tall Eucalyptus tree branches on the 101 in Encinitas, CA. Incredible flying but sketch.

This would definitely make such landings less risky.

21 posted on 04/23/2017 7:17:07 AM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: military cop
How am I supposed to hang in the door w my boots on the skid?

That brings back some memories. Door gunner in AFG on a blackout flight helicopter doing NOE above the treetops on a cloudy moonless night as fast as we could. My main job was to look for ground flashes to try and give the pilots a warning. That was a roller coaster rides the kids will never see the likes of.
22 posted on 04/23/2017 7:26:49 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

I have a couple friends at Sikorsky. As a joke, I offered them a straight across trade, three old S-76Bs for two of these. They countered with the trade plus I bring a huge bag of cash.


23 posted on 04/23/2017 8:00:19 AM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

I remember.
as a young medic in 1966 I was issued a Jeep-based front line ambulance (M-178, I think). It was basically a stretch M-38 and it was a very good vehicle, both on and especially off the road. I routinely heard, “Hey, Doc. We’re stuck. Pull us out,” from M-151 drivers. My response was usually, “Pound sand. You laughed at my old Jeep. Now you’re stuck. Karma.”
The M151 was a death trap and the front line ambulance version was worse!! Of course, I was familiar with the Jeep platform before I went into the Army.


24 posted on 04/23/2017 8:20:13 AM PDT by 91B40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

We’re in a very rural area of WV. There are two or three ambulances for the whole county.

Nearest hospital with any sort of emergency room is at least an hour drive, and that’s after the ambulance arrives and packs up the patient. I think the “real” trauma center is over 3. It’s not unheard of for a chopper to be sent if someone has a medical emergency or serious injury. Probably happens a couple times a year.

200+mph top speed could likely save a quite a few lives over time.


25 posted on 04/23/2017 10:27:24 AM PDT by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER

... If you had enough airspeed, you could even stop the main rotor’s rotation altogether and fly it like a fixed-wing biplane (theoretically)...


Sounds like what Airwolf would do right before it went supersonic. LOL

In fact the head-on shot in the article reminds me a lot of Airwolf.


26 posted on 04/23/2017 12:04:42 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

S-97 RAIDER™: The Next Big Thing in Army Aviation
https://youtu.be/HncZgouxt9k


27 posted on 04/23/2017 4:50:12 PM PDT by johnk (faithful with little....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
"...With twin rotors you can reduce their rotating speed as forward airspeed increases and still maintain lift on the "trailing" side of the aircraft. If you had enough airspeed, you could even stop the main rotor's rotation altogether and fly it like a fixed-wing biplane (theoretically)..."

Sikorsky built an experimental copter that was designed to do that very thing, the S-72 X-Wing. It had a rigid rotor system, and by rigid I mean no teetering, no flapping, no nothing, just rotating. The way the pilot made control inputs was by varying the amount of gas ducted from the engine and out of slots on the leading edges of the blades/wings. Then the gas would be blown back over the top of the wing, producing Coandă effect and some measure of lift. Which is exactly how blown flaps (AKA jet flaps) on airplanes work. They didn't calculate the system could effect enough "pitch change" to generate lift sufficient to support hovering but they did believe it would be capable of very short take-offs and landings.

The most bizarre part was that once it was in forward flight, the rotors were designed to stop spinning and be locked in an "X" configuration along the fuselage (as in the photo below), after which they would perform like conventional wings. Stopping/locking the rotors like this was supposed to greatly decrease drag and remove the limitations of retreating blade stall.

It also had stub wings that were big enough to maintain flight (albeit with very high wing loading) even without the rotor head, because the rotor head was jettisonable so if something happened and they needed to ditch the rotor system (like if they encountered some sort of destructive harmonic), they could blow it off and continue flying on the stub wings. They flew it stub-wings only to make sure it was airworthy and the program was cancelled before it was test-flown in any other configuration. IIRC that was because it fell so far short of their lift performance goals that there was no point continuing.


28 posted on 04/23/2017 4:58:05 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

I’d guess the blade configuration would make metro landings safer and the top speed would be an advantage ...
*******************************************
Air taxi from Dallas to Houston in one hour. Better than a high-speed rail system and much cheaper!


29 posted on 04/25/2017 3:47:03 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent

In fact the head-on shot in the article reminds me a lot of Airwolf.
***************************
As I recall, the Airwolf was a modified Bell 222.

Really liked that show. (Worked at Bell ‘65-2001)


30 posted on 04/25/2017 3:55:24 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent
Funny, I had thought of Airwolf also.

Airwolf theme

31 posted on 04/25/2017 4:01:26 AM PDT by csvset ( Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson