Posted on 04/20/2017 2:13:47 PM PDT by Lera
Thanks to a hoax pulled on the Huffington Post.
For a distillation of the contemporary left’s worldview, one needn’t look any further than a blog post that was recently published at the Huffington Post: “Could it Be Time to Deny White Men the Franchise?”
At least one could have turned to this post—until HuffPo took it down. But we’ll get to that shortly.
The author, a person going by the name of “Shelley Garland,” a self-declared South African and graduate student in philosophy, argued that it is morally necessary to temporarily deny the franchise to white men.
Moreover, at least some of their resources should be repossessed and “redistributed” to others.
Garland explains her reasons. First, white men are bad for left-wing progressivism. “Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year,” she writes, “have often been due to the votes of white men.” She gives examples. “If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa’s biggest cities.”
“If white men no longer had the vote,” Garland summarily states, “the progressive cause would be strengthened.” She’s quick to underscore that she is proposing nothing more than “the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation),” for this is all that it would take to “go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world.”
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
Ah, but they are doing it, in slow motion. Through socialism, they keep adding burdens to the productive members of society, they force those members to work harder which makes it difficult to replace themselves over time. The socialists, by favoring the underclasses makes it easier for them to reproduce and eventually be able to outvote and enslave the productive members, mainly whites.
“It is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa’s biggest cities.”
WELL DUH
You are correct. You have probably seen this:
Ineptocracy:............... ....... A system of
government where the least capable to lead are elected by
the least capable of producing, and where the members of
society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated
wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
The Left’s ultimate plan... I’m reminded of a joke:
What did liberals use before candles ?
Electricity.
Racist and sexist and man hating.
Repealing the 19th would apply only to those non-sensical women who vote on Wednesdays.
I would never disenfranchise you....
Hoax or not, what the article shows is that the Left, Dems, Blacks etc cannot compete in life without getting special consideration — either by affirmative action, quotas, BS lawsui”ts etc. The mind set in that article is, in fact, the mindset of many on the Left — maybe not taking away the vote from white males, but to give favoritism to the “oppressed” and “favorite” groups because they are incapable of competing without that. And of course, the “oppressed” and “favorite” groups are whatever the Left determines them to be for whatever it is they seek at the moment.
If the leftist weenies ever tried to attack whites en masse, they’d be shocked and awed by how fast they die and in such great numbers. Their bodies would be stacked like cordwood alongside every road throughout America.
We need to roll back more than 100 years of liberal treachery. With Trump, we finally have the chance.
Here is some truth: I don’t care much you like Social Security and Medicare, you know in your heart that they are wrong and must be stopped. Same for all of the earlier “progressive reforms.” People existed for several thousand years without government meddlers “inspecting” and regulating the food supply. From 4600 b.c. until the early 1900s, we managed without government building codes, but then we “needed” them. In the same period, we suddenly discovered a need to regulate business to make competition “fair.” Progressives said the needed government to stand between workers and employers to decide what is safe and what a fair wage is — and people fell for it. Later, the government took control of the water and even the air we breathe. And it told us that we could not choose our neighbors anymore. I could go on and on.
All this has to end!
Our political goal should be nothing less than the restoration of our Free Constitutional Republic. That can only be achieved by taking down the 80% unconstitutional portion of the $4 trillion federal government. Trump is a step, but I think we’ll need more to get the job done.
This means sending home packing literally hundreds of thousands of federal officials, bureaucratic heads, and workers without a job. I know of no power on earth that can make that happen. But God can make it happen and I think he may just do it and I think Trump is evidence of that.
It should be mostly sweeping cuts but most likely will take some time. Also because the feds have taken millions from Americans in the name of social security (SS), the feds have to give it back. So getting rid of SS will have to be a ramp-down.
That is why 2024 is so huge. We MUST have the right guy to follow Trump - someone who is ready, willing, and able to finish the job of cutting the feds all the way down to its constitutional size. Who is that guy? I don’t think it’s Pence.
My website, not fully finished, is meant to help by informing Americans about THEIR Constitution about which most are ignorant. The Constitution is our MAIN weapon for overthrowing the mostly illegal federal government. My Website is https://sonsofconstitutionalliberty.com/
We need to let the weak fail in order to let the strong succeed. A true patriotic, constitutional, law-based republic always favors and rewards strength and shuns weakness.
We should not bend our society and laws toward the goal of “helping the poor.” We need to encourage the poor to help themselves. We owe them liberty and nothing more. But liberty is more valuable than a monthly check, food stamps and free pills. With that, along with a strong faith in God, a good person can do anything. But liberals hate liberty because it reveals and punishes the slothful, the non-pius and the decadent.
The lifestyles lived by liberals is just beyond our comprehension and would never be sustainable or tolerated in a truly free society. Some examples:
- The vast majority of liberals are, to some extent or another, recreational drug users.
- Liberals don’t bother to really raise their children, who suffer horribly from neglect. Almost all kids in foster care come from liberal parents.
- Most liberals don’t choose a homosexual lifestyle, but 90% have “experimented” with unnatural, same-sex acts.
- Liberals work 30% fewer hours than conservatives, but file 99% of lawsuits against employers.
- At least 35% of married liberal couples are “swingers” or practice open marriage.
- On some liberal college campuses, 20% or more of students have quietly converted to Islam, or are studying it. Koran clubs are all the rage.
Nailed it!
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.