Posted on 04/19/2017 2:51:05 PM PDT by mdittmar
Yawn, more libtards wanting taxpayer money.
The progturds have so many marches that nobody really pays any attention anymore.
Oxymoron
If you’re a post-grad at the University of California you’ll be “represented” by the UAW (that’s right, the United Auto Workers). You don’t get a choice in the matter, that’s between the university and the union. In addition you’ll get an unethical high-pressure pitch to take the next step and join the union.
Will they wear vagina hats recently popularized in libtard marches to identify them as the pussies that they are?
Eff them and their subsidized jobs
Let them live in the real world
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
So the feds policing the environment remains unconstitutional imo.
“Of all the attacks on our civil society, the attacks on evidence-based science pose perhaps the greatest existential threat.”
And so we are given further PROOF that Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Unions are cancer!
What type of Scientists are these? Microwave Food developers?
Evidence based science like oh say... X AND Y CHROMOSOMES!!!???
“Scientists have long held the view that with enough data and evidence we will be able to convince skeptics that climate change is real, that humans are responsible and that immediate action must be taken. It is increasingly clear that this approach has not worked.”
That is the very definition of pseudo-science. One can accumulate any amount of data supporting, virtually, any theory. The thing that gives science its strength is that only one conter-example is enough to sink the theory. Science *is* skepticism.
And the UAW in particular? Give me a break!
OK. I see the problem.
Exactly. Same with doctors and many other professions.
“Of all the attacks on our civil society, the attacks on evidence-based science pose perhaps the greatest existential threat.”
By “attacks” they mean asking to see some real evidence.
The THEORY of evolution is quite real, as are the evolutionary processes it describes.
In science, the word "theory" does not mean "guess" or "supposition" as it does in ordinary, non-scientific language. Rather, "theory" refers to a conceptual framework that ties together the known facts on a subject and provides a basis to form testable hypotheses (which are educated guesses) about further facts which are not yet known.
For example, the theory of evolution tells me that because two species had a common ancestor millions of years ago, their genes are very similar but not exactly the same because they have been evolving separately. Therefore, if I know that gene RING exists in species A, I can hypothesize that it exists also in species B. Then I can do the experiments to look for it (and will probably find it).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.