Are you sure they don’t have facts or even an admission from him?
If they did, Bill wouldn’t be professing to have evidence of his innocence.
I think 21st Century Fox Inc’s new chairman Lachlan Murdoch Son of Rupert, and a liberal, railroaded Bill in an effort to change the culture of fox to something more compatible with his own ideology.
You don’t shoot yourself in the foot by throwing away your single best asset worth hundreds of millions of dollars a year on disputed claims, without a strong ideological agenda, and more than a little financial insanity.
They don’t have anything more than suspicion, and to be honest even if it were all 100% true it still would not justify throwing away Bill O’Reily who was still gaining popularity and rating’s dispute the thus far unproven charges.
A rational executive would have waited it out giving Bill the benefit of the presumption of innocence. This executive just cut the ties without that proof throwing away his single most valuable asset. How are we suppose to trust a network that does that?