Posted on 04/18/2017 7:23:18 AM PDT by Enlightened1
I think DACA has already been addressed by the immigration EO stating what criminality is. Criminals cannot be part of DACA. Hence, that protection is removed, essentially pulling people from the program without touching the program and causing a PR firestorm. Sneaky! :)
Register to vote: OUT
Use someone’s SSN: OUT
Receive welfare: OUT
Criminal records have always excluded people from DACA.
They are given their own SS# by the illegal program, so there is no need to have a fraudulent one.
The illegal program is continuing to operate as if it were law and not something dreamed up by Obama and should be ended.
No action by this administration makes it Trump’s illegal DACA program.
OPT is a much bigger problem IMO. For every H1 there are probably two dozen OPT’s here, many enrolled in fly-by-night diploma mills. They aren’t vetted to near the same degree as H1’s when they come. This is a back door left wide open for malefactors.
From http://cis.org/miano/primer-reporters-looking-h-1b-program:
H-1B Is Designed to Allow Employers to Replace Americans with Cheap Foreign Workers
Replacing Americans with H-1B workers has been going on at least since 1994.
In 1998, Congress responded explicitly by making it legal for employers to replace Americans with H-1B workers. Under the current law an employer may replace an American with an H-1B worker unless:
You have to navigate through two levels of misdirection in the code to piece all this together. Congress went to a lot of effort to ensure employers can replace Americans and to hide that fact from the casual reader of the code.
Confused as to what this means? Is this just the start of an investigation that will reap legislative results at a later date?
I agree.
It irks me to see State, City large equipment from foreign countries.
Komatsu, Kubota, Hyundai, Kawasaki Purchased by US government, Fed, State, City.
You’d think of all purchasing entities, governments would buy American.
Nonsense.
The H-1B is a temporary admittance visa; it's not a permanent alien residence status. There is no such thing as an "equal term" between a citizen and a foreigner here temporarily.
-PJ
In the case of Disney, it is hard to call the job "temporary," when the incumbent was doing it for decades. If they were retraining their replacements, was the expectation that the replacement would repeatedly retrain their own replacements when their temporary visas were expiring, or would their visas be repeatedly extended, violating the "temporary" intent of the job being filled, and of the person filling it?
-PJ
November 24, to be precise. (Assuming they mean calendar days; if it's working days, we're out to Feb. 20, 2018.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.